With Our Courts Starving for Resources, the ABA Will Redouble its Advocacy Efforts
Posted Apr 01, 2011 09:00 am CDT
In what country do courts require you to bring your own paper if you want to file a complaint?
Where are civil jury trials being suspended for up to a year?
Where is it that 97 percent of lawyers surveyed say their clients are under pressure to settle or plead because the court system is so seriously overloaded?
The answer to all is in our own country, due to a devastating nationwide funding crisis.
These are just a few of the findings from the inaugural public hearings and poll conducted by the Task Force on Preservation of the Justice System. On the first day of the 2011 ABA Midyear Meeting in February, task force chairs Ted Olson and David Boies heard expert testimony on the problems hitting the state courts. State chief justices were among those who detailed what is happening. (See “Beggaring Justice,” March.)
This third, co-equal branch of government is being allotted roughly 1 percent of states’ budgets. That amount is not just for judges and courtrooms; it is for prosecution, public defense and other important civil and criminal functions. The crisis affects all states.
Our court system is being starved of resources, making access to justice a luxury reserved only for the rich. When there is no access, there is no equal justice under law. That is simply unacceptable to all of us and jeopardizes our very democracy based on an adequately funded, co-equal branch of government—our judiciary.
It is also costly to business and job creation. A just-released study shows that, in Georgia alone, funding cuts crippled the state’s total economic output to the tune of $337-$802 million annually. Assuming Georgia is typical and working from the midpoint of those numbers, that puts the national cost of the state court funding crisis at roughly $28.5 billion per year.
Unfortunately, state courts are not the only places facing the budget ax. Legal aid providers that are funded through Legal Services Corp. grants are being threatened with measures that would slash LSC funding by more than $10 million a month during the rest of this fiscal year. That’s just for starters.
The ABA, a staunch backer of civil legal help for the poor and working class, must not allow it, especially in hard times when demand for court access is increasing.
The battle has been joined by the ABA’s Governmental Affairs Office, which has notched many significant victories on behalf of the profession and our justice system. The ABA’s nine registered lobbyists are talented, tireless advocates. Recent successes include:
• Clarifying “red flags” language to ensure the Federal Trade Commission’s identity theft provision does not apply to lawyers. This would have been very costly and diverted lawyers from client service to compiling paperwork on a nonexistent problem.
• Continuing unlimited Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. protections for lawyers’ trust accounts, providing money for low-income legal services and simplifying lawyer’s obligations regarding IOLTA.
• Preventing the Consumer Financial Services Protection Bureau, established by the Dodd-Frank Act, from having jurisdiction over the practice of most lawyers.
In this Congress, the GAO’s attention will focus on funding for the justice system, including the LSC. The other seven priorities of the ABA’s federal legislative push —as approved by the Board of Governors in February—are: criminal justice system improvements and protection of rights, elimination of discrimination and protection of civil liberties, health care and tort reform, immigration, independence of the judiciary, independence of the legal profession, and promotion of the rule of law.
TAKING IT TO THE HILL
The voice of the profession will be raised by ABA members April 12-14 during ABA Day—the association’s organized member lobbying campaign on Capitol Hill. This multiday advocacy event informs legislative leaders of the cost to their constituents when the justice system is damaged by indiscriminate budget cuts. Other issues, including push-back against attempts to federally regulate lawyers, also top the agenda. ABA Day—leveraging the expertise of some of our best and most dedicated members—can move legislators to favor the ABA’s positions on critical issues, as it has in the past.
Throughout the years, the ABA has realized that, in terms of legislative advocacy on Capitol Hill, members are our most effective resource. So speak out as an individual leader in your community. Talk about these issues in your civic and personal activities, at your office, and through your local and state bars. Also, join the ABA’s Grassroots Action Team. If there is any question about whether you have time or reason to participate, just remember Thomas Jefferson’s pointed message: “We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.”
Time to get out there and raise your voice for American justice.