Now in Legal Rebels:
Posted Sep 01, 2008 01:10 pm CDT
Most of the time, they’ve won. But this time Oregon’s Legislative Counsel Committee fired back with a cease-and-desist letter, claiming the state owns copyrights to the arrangement and subject-matter compilation of the statutes, the prefatory and explanatory notes, the tables, index and more.
Stanley of Palo Alto, Calif., enlisted Internet innovator Carl Malamud in the fight. He runs Public.Resource.org out of Sebastopol, Calif., and has successfully taken on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and C-SPAN on access issues.
The two questioned Oregon’s claim, arguing that public policy should weigh in favor of permitting Justia’s publication of Oregon statutes for free. Oregon made a counteroffer: For $15,000 a year, Justia Inc. (which provides search technology to ABAJournal.com) could license the state’s statutes. Stanley, who didn’t want a “patchwork of terms” for access among the various states, rejected the offer.
Lawyer-search site Avvo is engaged in a parallel struggle with several states over access to lawyer records. Avvo is trying to establish a rating system for lawyers based partially on data from public records that state agencies or courts maintain, but at least two states refused to provide the information. After petitioning the Supreme Court of New Jersey, Avvo obtained the records. But so far the company has been stymied in Illinois, says Avvo general counsel Josh King.
But for Stanley and Malamud, persistence is paying dividends; Oregon finally relented and decided to let Justia publish the state’s statutes—free.
The pair are working on agreements to publish the codes of all 50 states. As of mid-July, they’d posted 40. Though Oregon was the first state to send a C&D letter, Stanley and Malamud are expecting others. And the real losers, the legal publishers—with a $5 billion industry at risk—have yet to react.