U.S. Supreme Court
ABC Lawyer Points to Unclothed Supreme Court Sculptures During Indecency Arguments
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Jan 11, 2012, 08:38 am CDT
Comments
Not necessarily a huge fan of Waxman, but I gotta say that was pretty brilliant!
By Lex Luthor on 2012 01 11, 6:59 pm CDT
Pretty cheeky !!
By Come Mr. Taliban, tally me banana on 2012 01 11, 7:16 pm CDT
Day-O, Day-O, gratia.
When I first read the headline, I thought this was about sculptures of the current Justices, and the mere thought brought me near to hysterical blindness.
By B. McLeod on 2012 01 11, 7:23 pm CDT
Any affirm is o.k.
“A 4-4 tie is possible in the case, which would let stand a federal appeals court ruling striking down the FCC regulations, the NLJ says.”
By Docile Jim Brady on 2012 01 11, 7:53 pm CDT
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.
It now seems prescient that John Ashcroft wanted to cover up nude statues (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/01/29/statues.htm). Perhaps he anticipated an argument such as this.
By Will on 2012 01 11, 12:02 pm CDT