Like so many others, he can tell when the SEC is not doing its job.
By B. McLeod on 2013 09 23, 8:55 pm CST
You got that right B. McLeod!
I’m torn twix my desires for our eToys case. To have a cut through the manure justice like Judge Judy or His Honor Rakoff presiding is absolutely necessary, given the issues of willful blindness & federal venality duplicitous.
At the same time, how wonderful would it be, in our eToys case (where I’m alleging Goldman Sachs & Bain Capital are guilty of Civil RICO violations) - to have an attorney in your corner such as His Honor Rakoff?
In our case, where the SEC has destroyed the files a dozen times;
the SEC stands for “Selective Enforcement Agency”.
And “that” SEC won’t touch a hair on the head of Goldman Sachs and/or Bain Capital
No matter how overwhelming, profuse & irrefutable the evidence may be.
By Laser Haas on 2013 09 24, 7:01 am CST
Censorship is one of the main reasons that ScreenHunter has a job.
By Laser Haas on 2013 09 24, 7:43 am CST
Would that Raj Rajaratnam had, in fact, been sentenced by Judge Rakoff rather than former-Judge Richard Holwell whose case it was. I was surprised to see such a glaring error in the Journal’s print edition and am even more surprised that it hasn’t yet been corrected online. As a general matter, the profile of Judge Rakoff was informative and well-written however sketchy the fact checking may have been.
By Michael Shapiro on 2013 10 03, 12:25 pm CST
Well said Michael Shapiro…
By Laser Haas on 2013 10 07, 1:42 am CST
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
© 2014 ABA Journal and the American Bar Association | ABA Home
Questions, comments, or concerns? Contact us
Visit our desktop site