Back

ABA Journal

Home

Appellate Practice

Manning seeks presidential pardon in WikiLeaks case

Sep 4, 2013, 06:40 pm CDT

Comments

Why not? After all our Dear Leader promised to have the most transparent administration in the history of the Republic.

By Fred on 2013 09 04, 10:40 pm CDT

No doubt Manning thought adopting the name "Chelsea" and trying to be a woman would compel a Democrat to grant a pardon. We will see. Oddly, Manning's lawyer is still using the pronoun "him." Must not be an ABA member.

By B. McLeod on 2013 09 04, 11:17 pm CDT

I predict the President will just ignore this. He is under no obligation even to acknowledge its receipt, much less reply. Manning is not a whistleblower, he just likes to claim he is. Diplomats are entitled to candid evaluations of situations. Transparency in such internal communications is a vice, not a virtue.

Too bad Clinton wasn't paying attention when he pardoned Marc Rich. Unbelievably stupid move for a Rhodes scholar.

By Walt Fricke on 2013 09 05, 5:10 pm CDT

@3

I don't think that word means what you think it means. Manning revealed all sorts of lies that had been told by our Government. Sounds like a whistleblower to me.

By Fred on 2013 09 05, 10:12 pm CDT

Comment removed by moderator.

By B. McLeod on 2013 09 05, 11:11 pm CDT

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.