ABA Journal
Some Designers Say Their Work Deserves Copyright Protection; Others Say It Would Harm the Industry
By L. J. Jackson
Jul 15, 2011, 04:18 pm CDT
Comments
The nexus of fashion is replication of what is successfully marketable. Why shouldn’t design houses be subject to the same standards as music, but what is the point if the regulations are as loosely interpreted. Designers will continue to replicate what was previously commercially viable; this could be a HUGE area of opportunity for copyright law.
For a far superior “stripper shoe”, check out fendi’s fab interpretation:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_rqVICnrDSz4/S1Un8XTLiSI/AAAAAAAAAfU/VKIQxthhGes/s1600-h/fendi+clear+shoe.jpg
By Mallory Thornton on 2011 07 18, 1:01 am CDT
so, who gets the copyright on the stripper’s other garments? Get real
By Marian in CT on 2011 07 18, 12:34 pm CDT
Mallory Thornton @ 2: Elegant! But for sheer lunacy, the acrylic high-heeled boots with the gerbils in the platform are the best.
By BMF on 2011 07 18, 9:42 pm CDT
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.
If the original Stripper shoe design had been subject to copyright then Prada would not have made a fortune off their “knock off” of an old classic. To all the Design Houses pushing for this to pass… be careful for what you wish, you might be stepping on your own toes.
By Lee Hiller on 2011 07 17, 9:35 am CDT