ABA Home
Terrorism

Appeals Court Grants Alleged Terrorist New Hearing on Combatant Status

Posted Jul 16, 2008, 05:56 am CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss

A splintered federal appeals court, ruling in an en banc opinion, has upheld President Bush’s power to detain a Qatar man arrested here as an enemy combatant, but granted the suspect a new hearing to challenge his detention.

The Washington Post and the New York Times differed on the implications of the decision. The Times called it a victory for the Bush administration while the Post called it a setback.

The fractured 5-4 ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals gives Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri, held in a military brig without charges since 2003, a chance to refute evidence from an intelligence officer in a 2004 hearing. The officer’s sworn statement said Marri had met with Osama bin Laden and trained for a martyr mission here to commit mass murder and disrupt the banking system.

Marri was living in Peoria, Ill., and studying computer science when he was arrested.

The ruling effectively reversed a three-judge 4th Circuit panel. It ruled last year that Bush could not indefinitely detain people as enemy combatants when they had been living legally in the United States. Yesterday's en banc decision (PDF) included seven opinions. Judge William Traxler Jr. was the swing vote, the Times story says.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2004 that the U.S. military may indefinitely detain enemy combatants apprehended on the battlefield. Wake Forest law professor Robert Chesney told the Times that the fact Marri was living legally here, instead of being captured overseas, made the case a close call. “This consideration makes his case more difficult even in the eyes of relatively conservative jurists,” he said.

E-Mail This Story


(Separate multiple addresses with a comma.)




Share This Story

URL to share: http://www.abajournal.com/news/appeals_court_grants_alleged_terrorist_new_hearing_on_combatant_status/

Title: Appeals Court Grants Alleged Terrorist New Hearing on Combatant Status


Comments

  1. Posted by kay sieverding - 1 month, 2 weeks, 6 days, 1 hour, 25 minutes ago

    I think it is really great that the ABA is reporting regarding rights of individuals --"defending justice, pursuing liberty”. It must be politically difficult for the ABA to support 4th amendment rights when its sources of income are mainly from business and government and they seldom see the 4th amendment as important to them.

    The article here says “The officer’s sworn statement said Marri had met with Osama bin Laden and trained for a martyr mission”

    On Wikipedia it says that the evidence consisted of “Evidence has been disclosed that al-Marri was allegedly in possession of a telephone card that was previously used to call a number in Dubai linked to the reputed Al Qaeda finacier, Mustafa al-Hawsawi. After searching al-Marri’s computer, a folder was found labeled “jihad arena”, which according to the government, contained information on hydrogen cyanide, a poisonous gas used in chemical weapons, along with lectures by Osama bin Laden and a cartoon of planes crashing into the World Trade Center.[2]

    I think the idea of applying the rigor of the Rules of Criminal Conduct to other proceedings leading to detention is sound and, if adopted, will lead to the U.S. having a better reputation internationally.


Commenting has expired on this post.


Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.





Are you an ABA Member? Read This First

Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top