ABA Home
 
Law Firms

Appeals Court Vacates Ruling for Duane Morris in Malpractice Case

Posted Aug 1, 2008, 12:12 pm CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

A ruling by a federal appeals court clears the way for a plaintiff to pursue a malpractice suit against Duane Morris in state court.

The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a federal judge lacked jurisdiction to grant summary judgment to the law firm, since a plaintiff’s malpractice claim was grounded in state law, the National Law Journal (sub. req.) reports.

The plaintiff had contended a Duane Morris partner mishandled the representation of an LSAT prep company in a trademark infringement case. Duane Morris had removed the case to federal court because it involved questions of federal trademark law, and a federal judge granted summary judgment for the firm.

The appeals court opinion (PDF) said the federal issue was insubstantial and vacated the federal judge’s decision.


Comments not appearing after a few seconds? Try emptying your cache ("Temporary Internet files"), making sure Javascript is activated, and refresh this page.


Add Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.


Most Read



Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.



Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top