• Home
  • News
  • 1 in 5 Firms Face Unfunded Pension Threat

Law Firms

1 in 5 Firms Face Unfunded Pension Threat

Posted Apr 16, 2009 12:46 PM CST
By Rachel M. Zahorsky

The fate of WolfBlock's retirees when the 106-year-old firm dissolved prompted us to take a closer look at unfunded pension liabilties in the legal industry. And the consultants we spoke to said law firms should be taking a critical look at those programs, too.

Though law firm management generally shifted away from unfunded pension plans in the 1990s, one in five firms still has a nonqualified retirement plan that provides benefits upon withdrawal, Jim Cotterman, a principal at legal consultancy Altman Weil, told the ABA Journal in an interview, citing a recent survey of 145 law firms.

Such plans, which have current partners paying the benefits of retired partners, are more prevalent in firms with 100 lawyers or more. About 46 percent reported having these types of plans, according to the survey released by Incisive Media in January.

Now-defunct WolfBlock’s unfunded pension liability was also widely reported as a merger stumbling block for the white-shoe law firm.

“In the law firm context, this is an unsecured promise to pay,” Cotterman said. “If a firm goes bankrupt, that pension disappears.”

Even law firms that have discontinued these plans can be susceptible to contractual obligations to pay current and future retirees out of yearly revenues. Although WolfBlock no longer had an active unfunded pension plan, sources said the firm remained liable to retirees who had been promised benefits under the former plan. WolfBlock did not respond to requests for comment.

“There are huge intergenerational conflicts and compromises,” Altman Weil’s Cotterman said, when firms begin discussions to discontinue an unfunded pension.

Related ABAJournal.com coverage:

Did WolfBlock Infighting Lead to its Demise?

Retired WolfBlock Lawyers Out of Luck?

Why WolfBlock Didn’t Merge to Survive

Follow Rachel Zahorsky on Twitter @LawScribbler.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
Apr 16, 2009 12:55 PM CST

Like parents with errant children, the retirees sadly passed their firm to a generation that valued short-term gratification over continuing the firm and its traditions.  Oh well, it’s only a life’s work.

Flag this comment

2.

P. Bryson
Apr 16, 2009 1:41 PM CST

Seems like the normal pattern for pensions and other group retirement plans. Lure in the smart young folks with good benefits and then watch them cut the supports out from under you after you retire.

Flag this comment

3.

Charles W. Skinner
Apr 17, 2009 7:56 AM CST

Why ANY firm continues to offer a standard pension plan is beyond me, and why ANY associate or partner continues to accept them as compensation is beyond crazy.

USE the appropriate planning vehicle, where the individual controls the money.  The small-business world figured this out years ago that it protects the employee better AND removes a heavy liability from the books if you simply pay them (in a tax-deferred payment) up front, and then let the employee handle it.

The risk of a bankruptcy and getting only a percentage of what you’ve worked years for should be enough for any sane person to JUMP at the opportunity to get into a 401k / IRA type account.

Flag this comment

4.

David H.
Apr 17, 2009 8:54 AM CST

I’m surprised to see the comments defending the unfunded pension plan and blaming the younger lawyers for not wanting to carry on that burden (er, tradition).  Unfunded pension plans do not belong anywhere, and law firms should have been smart enough to see this earlier.  The sad thing here is that the existence of the unfunded pension plan seems to have caused the firm to die because it made the firm an undesirable merger partner.  Now, those lawyers who wouldn’t budge on changing their rights to unfunded pensions have lost any opportunity to collect them, and caused the demise of their firm.  Should serve as a warning to other firms in this situtation.

Flag this comment

5.

Rocco
Apr 18, 2009 6:29 PM CST

Just received my latest print-out showing my state-funded pension from the PD’s office.  It’s looking good.  What . . . me Neuman?

Flag this comment

6.

zekethewonderdog
Apr 19, 2009 9:12 PM CST

What’ s the big deal?  CPA firms have been doing this for years (assisted by lawyers).  The IRS calls it a 457 plan.  Deferred Comp, Golden Parachute?

Flag this comment

7.

B. McLeod
Apr 20, 2009 12:02 AM CST

Private law firms don’t have 457 Plans.  Also, 457 Plans are no longer “unfunded.”

I think these law firm arrangements are such that the benefits become payable, if at all, from the general assets of the firm, such that they are at risk if all those assets are needed to satisfy the firm’s business creditors.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.