Internet Law
Tony La Russa Sues Twitter over Imposter’s Page
Posted Jun 5, 2009 5:49 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa has sued Twitter claiming that the microblogging site refused to take down an imposter’s page that contained “derogatory and demeaning” remarks.
The suit alleges trademark infringement, cybersquatting and misappropriation of likeness and name, reports the St. Louis Post-Dispatch’s Bird Land blog. Two Wall Street Journal blogs, Digits and Venture Capital Dispatch, also covered the suit (PDF posted by Venture Capital Dispatch), filed in San Francisco superior court on May 6.
The fake Tony La Russa page carried his photo and included vulgar references to two Cardinals pitchers who died. The suit claims Twitter carried messages that said “Tony LaRussa is using Twitter,” leading to the implication that he was the author of the fake page.
Twitter posts a policy that says parody impersonation accounts are allowed as long as it is obvious that the profile is fake. However, impersonations may be removed if they aren’t clearly a joke. Twitter co-founder Biz Stone told Digits that the company doesn’t actively search for impersonators, but it is developing tools to identify legitimate celebrity and trademark owners. It is also adding staff to respond more quickly to customer concerns.
La Russa’s lawyer, Gregory McCoy, told Digits that he was in settlement talks with Twitter. La Russa, who has a law degree from Florida State University, wants to be compensated for the cost of filing the suit. There is also some talk about Twitter making a contribution to La Russa’s animal rescue foundation.
La Russa isn’t the only high-profile person whose identity has been hijacked on Twitter. A prankster created a fake Twitter page for Attorney General Eric Holder. One of the posts read: “Back from gitmo lol. They have a McDonalds and a BK and a KFC and surfing. Don't know why anyone would want to leave.”

Comments
Derick Schaefer
Jun 5, 2009 1:53 PM CST
And why is Twitter immediately settling when Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 gives them safe harbor? I applaud their efforts to be decent and more sites should be like Twitter but when CDA Immunity allows Ed Magedson to extort people on the web, you’d think Twitter wouldn’t settle so quickly. To read more: http://www.orangecaster.com/social-media/2009/06/generational-equity-a-scam-or-black-hat-social-media-victim/
*I’m a social media consultant and not an attorney but highly involved in this stuff.
Derick Schaefer
Jun 5, 2009 2:00 PM CST
And to clarify, I probably shouldn’t call out Ed by name but I am referring to The Rip-Off Report. He’s the owner and all over the news.
Just wanting to clarify that I’m not trying to target him personally. . .its the business model.
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.