• Home
  • News
  • 90-Day Suspension Recommended for Rude ‘Judge Judy’

Legal Ethics

90-Day Suspension Recommended for Rude ‘Judge Judy’

Posted Apr 13, 2009 8:08 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

A Seattle-area small claims and traffic-court judge is once again facing punishment for rude behavior on the bench.

Washington state’s Judicial Conduct Commission is recommending a 90-day suspension for Judge Judith Eiler, known as King County’s “Judge Judy,” the Associated Press reports.

The commission said Eiler cut off defendants as they were speaking and belittled them, according to the story. Witnesses “felt they did not have the opportunity to present their case; that they were scolded, intimidated, mistreated and threatened that their case would be decided not upon the facts, but upon how they responded to the judge," the opinion said.

A dissenting commission member said there is no evidence that Eiler made incorrect decisions or that her integrity was in question.

Eiler underwent behavior therapy with an emphasis on sensitivity training after she received a reprimand in 2005 for impatient and rude behavior.

Eiler’s lawyer, Anne Bremner, says her client is simply a no-nonsense judge with a high caseload.

"Her name is Judge Judy, but she's not like 'Judge Judy' on TV," Bremner told AP. "She's a very tough, old-fashioned judge and she loves what she does. She wants people to be better for having appeared before her."

Comments

1.

JR
Apr 13, 2009 9:52 AM CST

TV may or may not influence young children’s behavior.  It should not influence a grown-up judge’s.  Maybe this Judge Judy wanted a show of her own, like the Anna Nicole Smith judge who put on a clown show for the TV cameras.

I do not understand the dissenter.  A judge needs to treat litigants with civility, not just make “correct” decisions and have integrity.

2.

Nulla Poena Sine Lege in Ohio
Apr 13, 2009 11:40 AM CST

1. JR: “A judge needs to treat litigants with civility, not just make “correct” decisions and have integrity.”

Quite true. Part of civility, correctness and integrity is ensuring that the legislation forbidding conduct is effective BEFORE the alleged conduct. :-) Ask me hiw I know! :-)

3.

Former Prosecutor
Apr 13, 2009 6:35 PM CST

I once prosecuted in a low level court.  The judge did not want the court to be “of record,” because he wanted (when sentencing) to speak in the manner he thought most likely to get through some thick skulls.  Especially the habitual drunks and their continuing petty offences against the public peace and dignity.  He wanted me to skip foundation in many areas to speed things up (I didn’t do that, fearing I’d develop very bad habits).  But he was never discourteous to anyone on the stand, or who was fumbling around trying to present evidence.

I think this judge has not learned the right balance.

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.