• Home
  • News
  • 9th Circuit is 0 for 6 Before the Supreme Court

Antitrust Law

9th Circuit is 0 for 6 Before the Supreme Court

Posted Feb 26, 2009 6:34 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

The U.S. Supreme Court’s rejection yesterday of an antitrust “price squeeze” claim is the sixth decision this term overturning or vacating decisions by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Supreme Court has yet to affirm a decision by the San Francisco-based appeals court this term, the Daily Journal reports (sub. req.).

The Supreme Court ruling yesterday rejected a claim that an AT&T subsidiary engaged in an illegal price squeeze by charging competitors steep wholesale rates for high-speed Internet service. The court said companies that operate at both the wholesale and retail levels have no duty under federal antitrust law to offer competitive wholesale prices, according to the Daily Journal story.

The 9th Circuit has a reputation as a liberal and often-reversed appeals court. Last term, the Supreme Court ruled against the 9th Circuit in eight out of 10 cases, the Daily Journal story says.

This year doesn’t look any better for the circuit, according to University of Pittsburgh School law professor Arthur Hellman. "At this point, it looks as though the 9th Circuit's reversal rate this term will be at the high end for recent years," Hellman told the Daily Journal.

Comments

1.

joe
Feb 26, 2009 8:15 AM CST

I have zero faith in the 9th circuit and take everything they write with a grain of salt.  To me the 9th circuit is only a bunch of liberals trying to see who can’t write the most socalist and comunist opinion.

They all get overturned.  A loss at the 9th circuit is to be expected.  It’s just how entertaining and screwy will the opinion be is the question.

I would be in favor of firing everyone on the 9th circuit and sending those cases elsewhere.

Flag this comment

2.

Deyseeme T. Rollin
Feb 26, 2009 12:10 PM CST

@1, Joe:  Too bad about that whole “appointed for life” thing.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.