Criminal Justice

A Corporation Is Not a Person for Car Pool Lane Purposes, Calif. Judge Rules


image

Image from Shutterstock.

A corporation is considered a person under the law of California (and numerous other states). But that doesn’t mean a corporation counts as a passenger when it comes to satisfying a car pool lane requirement that a vehicle contain two or more people, a California judge has ruled.

Jonathan Frieman handed a California Highway Patrol officer incorporation papers from the passenger seat in October, when he was pulled over for the apparent vehicle-occupancy violation, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. But the officer was not convinced that a corporate passenger was present in Frieman’s vehicle and told the 56-year-old San Rafael resident he would have to tell it to the judge.

Despite the assistance of an attorney, who argued on Frieman’s behalf at a Monday hearing that freeway signs requiring “2 or more persons” in car pool lanes are unconstitutionally vague, a Marin County Superior Court judge wasn’t convinced either.

Rejecting the argument by attorney Ford Greene, traffic referee Frank Drago said the underlying purpose of the law shows why a corporation, even if a person, is not a passenger.

“Common sense says carrying a sheath of papers in the front seat does not relieve traffic congestion,” Drago told Frieman. “And so I’m finding you guilty.”

Frieman plans to appeal the ruling.

Previous:
Judge Rescinds Order to Seize Home Computers of Juror Accused of Web-Surfing During Trial

Next:
How the NRA Seeks to Influence the Makeup of the Federal Bench


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.