• Home
  • News
  • ACLU and Lawyers Guild Seek Differing Probes of Ex-Administration Lawyers

Legal Ethics

ACLU and Lawyers Guild Seek Differing Probes of Ex-Administration Lawyers

Posted Mar 18, 2009 11:50 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Two liberal legal groups are seeking ways to penalize administration officials and lawyers who authorized harsh interrogations of terrorism suspects.

The American Civil Liberties Union has asked Attorney General Eric Holder to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate alleged torture at secret prisons run by the CIA, the Washington Post reports. The request comes after details of a secret report on the interrogations came to light.

The report by the International Committee of the Red Cross concludes some al-Qaida detainees were tortured by the CIA and subjected to "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment." Detainees were subjected to waterboarding, forced to crouch in painful positions in coffin-like boxes and slammed into walls, according to the allegations. The ACLU letter (PDF) to Holder says it has evidence of CIA involvement in detainee deaths and torture that includes setting a prisoner’s hand on fire, putting lit cigarettes in a prisoner’s ear and breaking a prisoner’s shoulders.

The ACLU says is wants a “top-to-bottom review” of interrogation decisions, including those made at the highest levels of government, and cites legal memos justifying harsh interrogations written by Justice Department lawyers.

Meanwhile, the National Lawyers Guild is taking a different tack. It has filed a disciplinary complaint with the State Bar of California against former Defense Department general counsel William “Jim” Haynes II, now a lawyer with Chevron. The guild claims Haynes breached his duty as a lawyer by providing cover for harsh interrogations, the Los Angeles Times reports.

Another ethics complaint will be filed in Pennsylvania against former Justice Department lawyer John Yoo for his memos backing harsh techniques, the story says. Yoo, now a law professor at Berkeley, has defended his work, saying they were an attempt to give “unvarnished, straight-talk legal advice.”

Haynes released a statement defending his actions, BCN reports in a story posted to CBS5.com. "I discharged my responsibilities as a lawyer and an officer of the United States honorably,” he said. “It is unfortunate that this kind of charge is becoming a cost of public service."

Comments

1.

John Sherwood Jr.
Mar 18, 2009 12:56 PM CST

“It is unfortunate that this kind of charge is becoming a cost of public service.”

Well I think that Mr. Haynes misses the point, that it is the QUALITY of public service that is being questioned.

Regardless of political stripe, when public officials systematically engage in an effort to erode the rule of law, civil liberties, or expand the scope of government authority without limit, then they should expect there may be a little hell to pay at some point.  I certainly hope that the current administration is learning from the lessons of the former administration.  If they think they are going to be get away with the same sort crap, I think they’ll be disappointed.

I also find the implied attack on public oversight of the government quite an indictment of the Bush Administration.  If a liberal suggested that people won’t serve in the government if they are going to be scruitnized by the electorate, Rush Limbaugh would have that person hanged in the town square.

Flag this comment

2.

tim
Mar 19, 2009 6:44 AM CST

people don’t work in government for public service - people work in government for the automatic pay raises each year, the free health care, the job for life, and a gauranteed pension for life.

government jobs are for lazy people who want job security and people to take care of them all their life.

Flag this comment

3.

B. McLeod
Mar 19, 2009 8:37 PM CST

Sounds pretty good.  Where do I sign up?

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.