Business of Law

After a Vote, Merger of Luce Forward and McKenna Long Still Not a Done Deal


The law firms of Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps and McKenna Long & Aldridge voted on a potential merger late last week, but there is still no official deal.

The Daily Journal (sub. req.) quotes Luce Forward spokesperson Jack Berkman, who says the deal has not yet closed. “We are still in negotiations” over some remaining issues, he said.

According to the Daily Journal, Luce Forward partners voted unanimously to approve the merger, but “the result of McKenna Long’s vote remained unclear late Friday.” One unnamed source tells the Daily Journal that the merger plan calls for de-equitizing many Luce Forward partners or changing their status to prevent layoffs.

A Recorder story on the merger talks published in November says Luce Forward was expecting lower revenues this year because of the real estate downturn.

Previous:
Law Profs: Cap Income of One Percenters When Inequality Reaches 'Tipping Point'

Next:
Federal Judge Calls Blago Lawyer's New-Trial Motion 'Harebrained,' Says Contempt Ruling Could Result


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.