• Home
  • News
  • AG Asks Whether Potential Deportees Have Right to Effective Lawyers

Immigration Law

AG Asks Whether Potential Deportees Have Right to Effective Lawyers

Posted Oct 30, 2008 6:13 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Attorney General Michael Mukasey has asked lawyers in three immigration cases to submit briefs on whether aliens have a right to effective assistance of counsel and if so, how they can enforce the right.

The move comes as the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals allowed immigrant Maria Galvez to reopen her case because the lawyer who took $5,000 in fees from her didn’t turn in the required documents, resulting in a dismissal, the Los Angeles Times reports.

Galvez’s new lawyer, Stacy Tolchin, says Galvez is not the only immigrant whose case was botched by an incompetent lawyer. "This is a huge problem, attorneys not following through," Tolchin told the newspaper. "They take the money, they file one document, they do nothing and the people are deported."

Mukasey’s request for briefs was made in three different cases decided by the Bureau of Immigration Appeals. The 9th Circuit is one of several federal appeals courts that have recognized a constitutional or statutory right to effective assistance for aliens, Legal Times reports. Others include the 1st and 2nd U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal.

The ABA has submitted a letter to the attorney general that says it considers the right to effective assistance to be of utmost importance, the Los Angeles Times story says.

Mukasey is weighing the effective assistance question even as he is proposing new rules that would give the Justice Department’s Executive Office for Immigration Review more authority to punish incompetent lawyers, the Legal Times story says. Usually state ethics bodies take the lead in disciplining immigration lawyers.

Comments

1.

JR
Oct 30, 2008 10:10 AM CST

What a disgrace by Mukasey even to think that any person subject to our legal system does not have a right to competent counsel.  This is an Attorney General?
I can hardly wait for him and his boss, the president, to pack up and leave town come January 20.

Flag this comment

2.

J.D.
Oct 30, 2008 2:10 PM CST

The rights of aliens within our legal system have been debated since the late 1800s and the Supreme Court has never said that aliens are entitled to fully Constitutional protections, especially not illegal aliens.

Furthermore, an alien usually only comes into contact with immigration courts—Executive Branch courts—and not judicial branch courts. There remains plenty of debate about the extent to which the judicial branch should be involved in immigration cases. The Court has held for most of the past century that immigration is something for the political branches alone.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.