• Home
  • News
  • Amended SEC Complaint Accuses Stanford, CFO of Running Ponzi Scheme

Securities Law

Amended SEC Complaint Accuses Stanford, CFO of Running Ponzi Scheme

Posted Mar 2, 2009 6:11 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed an amended complaint against R. Allen Stanford that alleges the Texas billionaire ran a huge Ponzi scheme and took at least $1.6 billion of investor money in personal loans.

The amended complaint also accuses James Davis, the chief financial officer of Stanford's company, of participating in the Ponzi scheme, the Wall Street Journal reports (sub. req.).

The original SEC complaint accuses Stanford, Davis and the company’s top investment officer, Laura Pendergest-Holt, of defrauding investors in bank certificates of deposit at an Antigua affiliate out of $8 billion by promising improbable returns and claiming wrongly that the money was in safe investments.

Pendergest-Holt was arrested last week and charged with obstructing justice by misleading the SEC in its investigation of the Antigua bank. She was released Friday on $300,000 bond and required to wear an electronic surveillance device, according to the Wall Street Journal story.

The complaint says Stanford and Davis came up with a figure for investor returns each month at the Antigua bank and asked internal accountants to draft financial statements to match, the story says. Pendergest-Holt facilitated the scheme, the complaint claims, by telling investors she managed the Antigua bank’s assets.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
Mar 2, 2009 7:17 AM CST

Years late, and many dollars short.

Flag this comment

2.

tim
Mar 2, 2009 10:08 AM CST

Why is everyone at the SEC incompetent?  How can they let this go on in case after case?  Is the SEC being bribed or they just aren’t doing their jobs?

Flag this comment

3.

Bill Dugan
Mar 2, 2009 10:25 AM CST

Perhaps the SEC is finally getting off their fat arses, now that the horses are not only out of the barn, but off the farm.

I think that McLeod and Tim are right.  They had guys down there at the SEC that were interested in stupid things like Plain English, so that incomplete disclosure could be understood by the layman.

Now that everyone can read, they can see that the SEC plumb forgot to do their jobs.

There should be a new view down there not to focus on window dressing but on audiing companies to see they are not cooking the books.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.