• Home
  • News
  • An AG’s Quick Victory: Arbitration Forum Exits Credit Dispute Business

Alternative Dispute Resolution

An AG’s Quick Victory: Arbitration Forum Exits Credit Dispute Business

Posted Jul 20, 2009 5:36 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Facing a showdown with the Minnesota attorney general, the National Arbitration Forum has agreed to stop arbitrating consumer credit disputes.

NAF is the nation’s largest company arbitrating past-due credit card disputes, Business Week reports. The company will no longer accept any kind of consumer arbitrations by the end of the week.

Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson had filed suit against NAF last week, claiming the company had “extensive ties” to the debt collection industry. Swanson announced the settlement on Saturday, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reports.

Swanson had alleged NAF had ties to a large debt-collection agency called Axiant through one of their owners, a hedge fund. Nearly 60 percent of the debt collection claims handled in 2006 by NAF had been filed by an Axiant predecessor, Swanson said last week at a press conference announcing the suit.

Swanson also said the NAF had worked with credit card companies to place mandatory arbitration clauses in their contracts.

In a statement, Michael Kelly of Forthright, which handles administrative services for NAF, said the company pulled out of consumer arbitrations to avoid “mounting legal costs, a challenging economic climate, and increased legislative uncertainty surrounding the future of arbitration.”

“The forum lacks the necessary resources to defend against increasing challenges to arbitration on all fronts, including from state attorneys general and the class action trial bar,” Kelly said.

The NAF will continue to arbitrate Internet domain name disputes, personal injury protection claims and cargo disputes, the Associated Press reports.

Comments

1.

Class Advocate
Jul 20, 2009 6:58 AM CST

Here is a list of pending class action suites relating to credit and debit cards.

http://www.classadvocate.com/?direct=y&category=product&product;_root[]=984&product;_root[]=80

Flag this comment

2.

Mpls Atty
Jul 20, 2009 12:18 PM CST

Unfortunately, this is an attorney general that has been slammed (and hard) for busting a union in her office.  The Minnesota Legislative Auditor confirmed last year that she had ordered attorneys to falsify affidavits, file meritless lawsuits for good press, etc.  She’s a bad apple, and while I’m no fan of NAF, I think it’s unfortunate that progressives are willing to turn a blind eye to the awful things that Lori Swanson has done in her office just because we dislike NAF.  NAF is terrible, but Lori Swanson has shown that her tactics aren’t any better.

Flag this comment

3.

Jim | 2009-07-20-Mo 1610 -0400
Jul 20, 2009 2:12 PM CST

Who slammed Ms. Swanson?

MLA?

A disciplinary process?

Flag this comment

4.

CS
Jul 21, 2009 11:56 AM CST

From what I have read of the inherent bias in private industry run arbitration, NAF was the Darth Vader of credit card arbitration firms.  But they are hardly the only group doing these things, for nearly all such groups rely on repeat business from corporations for their funds.  This is a conflict of interest that should never have been allowed.  The system only became more biased as time went on.  Similar exposure of bias and other problems has been done by Public Citizen on not only NAF, but Construction Arbitration Services (CAS) and others.  Public Citizen exposed this firm twice, once I believe in about 2004, and most recently this year in their report “Home Court Advantage.”  For anyone who thinks it’s just as easy as crossing out an arbitration clause think again; if courts had enforced the principle of ‘contract of adhesion’ and other issues of why an arbitration clause shouild be unenforceable we would not be here having this discussion now.  The site FairArbitrationNow.org has a boat load of info including the report mentioned above on housing and arbitration.  I have heard many home buyers say they managed to avoid an arbitration clause when buying a newly built house, only to be dismayed after closing when the builder’s “gift” arrives, the 10 year warranty with an arbitration clause.  FEW people get the courts to let them out of arbitration even when they didn’t see or sign the clause in the warranty. 

Nearly everything we buy has a hidden arbitration clause, that even some lawyers don’t understand takes away their rights.  It’s never marketed as what it is—a rigged “justice” system run by corporations, it’s touted instead as being faster, fair, and cheaper.  Many consumers find out too late that it’s anything but.  Arbitration was never meant under the Fed. ARbitration Act to operate this way.  Corporations have exploited it to their advantage in a big way.  This needs to be fixed.  That is why the Arbitration Fairness Act needs to pass.

Flag this comment

5.

Disillusioned Minnesotan
Jul 21, 2009 8:23 PM CST

Ms. Swanson is not your knight in shining armor.  First, the Minnesota AG’s office has been ignoring consumer complaints about NAF for the last 7 years.  Swanson only files suits when other states have already done so, and is confident that she can make a huge splash in the press before immediately settling the suit.  Second, Swanson is a bad apple.  She busted a union in her office, and a legislative auditor’s investigation into her office confirmed that she ordered attorneys to falsify affidavits, file meritless suits to generate good press, etc.  Swanson is a democratic version of Sarah Palin.  While the end result here is good (NAF is out of the picture), Swanson does not deserve our thanks.  Minnesota deserves an attorney general that will practice what she preaches, an will protect our consumers even when the cameras aren’t rolling.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.