• Home
  • News
  • April is the Cruelest Month for Lawyers Behind on Their Taxes

Law Practice Management

April is the Cruelest Month for Lawyers Behind on Their Taxes

Posted Apr 1, 2009 5:43 PM CST
By Martha Neil

Although most lawyers pay their taxes and file their returns on time, some don't. And those who don't often make for a doozy of a story.

One longtime Illinois lawyer, now deceased, simply refused to file, says George Collins, himself a longtime Chicago practitioner who regularly represents attorneys in disciplinary and ethical matters. Eventually, this scofflaw lawyer came to the attention of the Internal Revenue Service, but the story has a happier ending than one might expect.

Because the lawyer made a practice of overpaying his estimated taxes by a considerable amount on a timely basis, the IRS decided to let well enough alone and just keep accepting the overpayments, Collins tells the ABA Journal. This, of course, is not what he recommends as a best practice to attorneys and other clients concerning their own tax obligations.

There is similar good news, however, for those who have procrastinated too long and are worrying anew as another April 15 filing deadline approaches:

They can probably avoid prosecution by sending a check and a tax return to the IRS before the agency comes to them, Collins says. While there is no guarantee that all will go well, the IRS is usually willing to overlook issues regarding past-due returns and underpaid tax when a scofflaw comes forward to make amends.

Thus, by doing so, lawyers and others who have gotten behind on tax obligations can generally wipe the slate clean, he says. They should, however, expect to pay potential hefty penalties due to their delay.

As a starting point, Collins says, he often recommends that clients with tax issues get to work, with the help of an accountant, on preparing a Form 1040X (PDF), which amends a prior return. That gives them a realistic picture of what will be expected when they go to the IRS, with hat and check figuratively in hand.

"If the person comes forward, even though belatedly" and "makes nice and pays the taxes," Collins says, that's usually the end of the story.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
Apr 1, 2009 6:00 PM CST

Also, if the person wants to avoid the “hefty penalties” (plus interest), they can get the President to put in their name for a cabinet post.  Then, they just have to pay the actual tax, and all is forgiven.  No enforcement, and they get to keep whatever they earned on the underpayment.

Flag this comment

2.

Joseph
Apr 2, 2009 2:24 PM CST

Ah too true.  I think he actually goes out and seeks tax cheats for cabinet posts.

Change we can depend on!!!

Flag this comment

3.

Hylas
Apr 3, 2009 7:39 AM CST

All these appointees paid the normally assessed penalties & interest on their amended taxes.  They were not nonfilers like those mentioned in this article.  Taxpayers frequently have to amend returns to correct prior mistakes.  Most of the mistakes I’ve heard of by these appointees have been quite common & understandable.  Of course there were a few where the appointee clearly should have known better.

Flag this comment

4.

Steven G.
Apr 3, 2009 8:49 AM CST

I read about an IRS employee in CA who reported a loss when he shouldn’t have on his tax return, and is now going to be criminally sentenced. Made me think about our Treas Sec.Apparently, the lowly IRS employee’s real mistake was not donating to the Obama campaign instead of hiring a lawyer to defend his tax case.

Flag this comment

5.

Stasik
Apr 3, 2009 1:02 PM CST

Hylas: 
I also often forget to account for tens of thousands of dollars on my return.  Between myself and the hired gun I pay to do the taxes for me - a hundred grand or so can easily fall between the cracks.

Flag this comment

6.

R
Apr 3, 2009 3:26 PM CST

Comment no. 1 is factually inaccurate and should be removed for that reason. See comment no. 3.

Comment no. 4 is just plain stupid.

Flag this comment

7.

B. McLeod
Apr 4, 2009 9:06 PM CST

I believe it is actually comment 3, and now 6, that suffer from accuracy concerns.  Perhaps the posters would be good enough to identify which of the nominees they believe to have paid penalties, and tie that to a source?

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.