• Home
  • News
  • Attorney Robert Wone’s Murder in Law Partner’s Upscale Home Is Still a Mystery

Criminal Justice

Attorney Robert Wone’s Murder in Law Partner’s Upscale Home Is Still a Mystery

Posted Jun 2, 2009 5:24 PM CST
By Martha Neil

Somehow, attorney Robert Wone was murdered in the upscale Washington, D.C., townhome where he was visiting friends one sweltering summer night in 2006.

But exactly how that happened remains a head-scratcher, reports the Washington Post in a two-part series Sunday and yesterday that details at length the prosecution's theory of the case.

Although three roommates there—including former Arent Fox law firm partner Joseph Price—have been charged with conspiring to conceal the "true circumstances" of Wone's fatal stabbing in Price's Dupont Circle home, no one has been charged with Wone's murder.

And, as the Post articles make clear its own reporter, doesn't find the prosecution's theory of how the three roommates may have been involved in covering up Wone's perhaps sex-related killing—which occurred some 90 minutes after he entered the townhome that evening—entirely persuasive.

With their D.C. Superior Court trial still a year ahead of them, the three defendants aren't saying much. But in an e-mail to friends last year, they offered a glimpse of their situation:

"Our attorneys estimate that the cost of a trial, which will necessarily involve a number of experts, will run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars," they wrote, seeking donations to a legal defense fund.

"We have no choice but to sell and liquidate every asset in order to pay this staggering sum as our very freedom hangs in the balance. Our parents are doing the same, sacrificing retirement savings and taking on unprecedented debt to aid us."

Earlier coverage:

ABAJournal.com: "Prosecutor Seeks More Charges in Case of Murdered D.C. Area Attorney"

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
Jun 3, 2009 12:29 AM CST

There is really no substitute for getting the forensics right.  Since they didn’t, there will be a lot of foundational issues, and what might actually have been learned from the Blackberry or competently-preserved blood spatter evidence has been lost.  Most curious is the number of pre-mortem needle wounds.  The theory of injection of an incapacitant does not explain so many, or the diverse locations.  Alternate explanations that might have been examined (but there is no indication that they were) would have been use of accupuncture needles to incapacitate, or (in the odd context of this case) use of IV needles to exsanguinate.  The latter could relate to why the body might have appeared to have too little bleeding from major, pre-mortem, puncture wounds (described by the EMTs as if the body had been washed and redressed).  The articles do not reflect whether there was significant missing blood volume, or any testing for that.  Greater attention possibly should have been given to the depth and placement of the needle wounds.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.