Law Practice Management
BigLaw ‘Has Changed Forever,’ Says Womble Carlyle, Cutting Pay 10 Percent
Posted Apr 14, 2009 5:06 PM CST
By Martha Neil
Imposing a roughly 10-percent pay cut that will be less for some and more for others, a well-known 530-attorney Southeast and Atlantic regional firm says there has been a sea change in corporate law practice.
"The world of large law firms ... has changed forever," says Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice in an internal memo on the pay cuts published by Above the Law. A spokesman for the firm has confirmed to the ABA Journal that the text of the memo is accurate.
Expecting more value, corporate clients are requiring their counsel to cut costs without reducing quality, and attorneys must do so to continue operating a successful law firm, the memo recounts. "Simply stated, like the business world in general, law firms must be able to do more with less."
For its part, Womble Carlyle is addressing with salary cuts for "many" attorneys and paralegals a "new world" in which the firm says it expects fees for transactional and litigation matters to stay flat or even decline. Those with stellar skills and work ethics may not see any pay reduction at all. However, those who are underperforming could see their pay cut more than 10 percent, the firm writes.
Current first- and second-year associates as well as new first-years joining Womble Carlyle in the fall can expect a 10 percent pay cut, according to the memo.
While this shift to a new compensation paradigm will not be popular, it is necessary to continue to succeed in a "transformational" legal world, the firm states. "The earlier we make these changes, the greater will be our opportunities for success."
The pay cuts take effect April 15.

Comments
B. McLeod
Apr 14, 2009 5:49 PM CST
We can hope that the change is indeed forever, and that lessons will not be forgotten when the economy rebounds. Fortunately, firms that have been wasting money like it was out of style have plenty of room to “do more with less.”
Bjorn T.
Apr 14, 2009 5:51 PM CST
B. McLeod, you are better known than Womble Firm. You should get your own news item.
Rory
Apr 17, 2009 6:25 AM CST
Bull pucky. I’m sure partner profits are the real driver. When firms start voluntarily reducing those to meet client demands I’ll start paying attention. I’m always surprised when people take these self-serving rationalizations for firings and associate pay cuts at face value.
D.Hazlett
Apr 17, 2009 6:36 AM CST
I have worked in a number of different settings as a lawyer: associate in a highly specialized practice; associate within a practice group in a mid sized firm (100 lawyers); partner in a 5 partner boutique firm; general counsel of a $200+ company. No experience in the king size firm, and when I was in law school they were not so prevalent (and I wouldn’t have been a candidate for them anyway) so my observations are from the outside. Now, with the disclaimer in place, and paraphrasing from my thoughts about business in general: Too much business school and not enough practice of law. In business, take care of business and the money will follow. In law, take care of the client and the money will follow. If you let the money lead in either instance, then … oops!
ellen lorenzen
Apr 17, 2009 7:07 AM CST
I never reduced the pay of underperformers by 10% when I owned a firm. I fired them.
brad
Apr 17, 2009 9:50 AM CST
What is a “stellar” “work ethic”?
DecGrad
Apr 17, 2009 9:53 AM CST
Sounds like a good idea to me. I understand the need the preserve high partner salaries. That’s the most useful carrot a firm has to motivate it’s associates. And I like to see at least first year salaries reduced. $160K is ridiculous and undeserved by anyone fresh out of law school, no matter how well they did in academia. The big firms offering $135K still have an eye popping starting salary, are still attracting highly qualified applicants, but must have a far easier time making their business model work.
Mac90
Apr 17, 2009 10:08 AM CST
What has changed is that the firms that have operated by the law of the jungle rather than as firms are eating each other. Happy hunting !
Rocco
Apr 18, 2009 6:25 PM CST
PD’s office just gave me a $5000 raise.
B. McLeod
Apr 18, 2009 7:33 PM CST
Wherever that is, Rocco, you should stay as long as possible. Most of the states are cutting budgets and handing PDs almost impossible caseloads.
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.