• Home
  • News
  • BigLaw Partner Sets World Record By Running 105th Marathon in a Year

Work/Life Balance

BigLaw Partner Sets World Record By Running 105th Marathon in a Year

Posted Dec 17, 2008 6:21 PM CST
By Martha Neil

Not content to rest on his laurels as a BigLaw partner, Larry Macon has also been ambitious on another front.

"When the San Antonio litigator crossed the finish line of the Dallas White Rock Marathon last Sunday, he marked his 105th marathon this year and qualified for the Guinness Book of World Records," reports the Tex Parte Blog.

The soon-to-be 64-year-old partner of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld says finding a way to run so many marathons was harder logistically than physically.

A self-described "marathon maniac," he first put on his running shoes at age 49, as the big 5-0 loomed. He has run a total of 413 of the 26.2-mile races in the past five years, reports the San Antonio Express.

While many men focus on other fancies as a milestone year with a zero in it approaches, "I couldn't find a convertible or a blonde,” jokes Macon, who is married to another lawyer.

Macon became inspired to run so many races in 2008, the newspaper says, when he learned that the record for one year then listed by the Guinness Book of World Records was 99.

While he's now planning to take a bit of a breather, he expects to be back on track early next year at the Mississippi Blues Marathon in Jackson on Jan. 3, according to Tex Parte.

Comments

1.

Katherine Dobson
Dec 18, 2008 9:25 AM CST

Another old rich guy for you to roll your eyes at and use to channel your hatred of the rich.

2.

Katherine Dobson
Dec 18, 2008 11:07 AM CST

holler

3.

Bill Dugan
Dec 18, 2008 4:57 PM CST

This guy is obviously not that important to the billables.  He’d probably be running off to the pot when he needed to making a motion.  What kind of litigator is off running 100 marathons a year?  What an oaf!

4.

Kiki
Dec 19, 2008 6:47 AM CST

Oh my GOD Rick (Dick) Presutti of SRZ will be really mad now…

5.

BC
Dec 19, 2008 8:20 AM CST

This is why big law firms are shutting down.  The partnes who are making more than $500K a year (and this guy is probably making a heck of a lot more than that) are out running 105 marathons during a given year instead of working to earn their salary.  Let’s fire the young associates who want to work so that we can keep people like this who want to go out and run all day long.  Unbelievable.  Akin should be embarrassed that this article got posted.

6.

Jeremy
Dec 19, 2008 8:32 AM CST

How much is the firm’s health insurance rates going to raise to pay for the arthroscopic surgery on this fool’s knees running a marathon every third day on average?

Lift weights and do moderate cardio (max of 30 miles a week) and you’ll be healthy and look good. 

Most marathoners look awful for all the time and effort they put into physical training.

7.

Bones
Dec 19, 2008 8:36 AM CST

What a bunch of haters. Nothing positive to say. He probably works all week, and runs once a week, on marathon day. Rests is body during the work week.

8.

B. McLeod
Dec 19, 2008 8:40 AM CST

Run, Forrest, run!!

9.

Unimpressed
Dec 19, 2008 9:00 AM CST

Marathons are largely a joke, taken seriously by those who believe they are truly accomplishing something by “competing” in nothing more than a walk-a-thon.  The Boston Marathon is the biggest joke of all.  Unless you are in to “win,” you are just a spectator in jogging shoes….

10.

Impressed
Dec 19, 2008 9:52 AM CST

Wow… I can’t believe how much negativity there is in the comments.  This is a tremendous accomplishment and I commend Mr. Macon for his efforts.  I know more than one triathlete lawyer, and they are all hard workers who use the exercise as a way to get out of the office and stay healthy. 

How many of the negative posters could run 1 marathon?  The San Antonio article say he runs with times between 5 and 8 hours (3-5 miles per hour), so I challenge everyone here to go out and run/walk 5 miles in one hour, then come back and fling insults.

And as far as the “rich lawyer” comments.  I highly doubt he is billing for the time he spends running.  And if he gets a piece of the billables for clients he brought to the firm, why is that so bad?

11.

NeverDoneThisBefore
Dec 19, 2008 10:43 AM CST

I have never commented but feel inspired to do so by this article. 

The feat is impressive.  There are only 52 weeks in a year, so he is running an average of 2 marathons each week with an extra marathon thrown in to make 105.  I know I could not do that, nor do I really want to…

I think the venom from people is coming from some feeling that the attorney could only pull this off because he is in BigLaw.  I do not know how many solos or small firm lawyers would be able to take the time off to run 2 marathons a week.  I doubt he spent his time doing anything but billing and working on originations while climbing the ladder to partner.  Now that he can have time to do something like this, he should.  I am envious not of his running but of his success in working the system he is in to his advantage.

12.

Rural Defender
Dec 19, 2008 11:21 AM CST

I am envious not of his running but of his success in working the system he is in to his advantage.

yup.  working the system to his advantage.  this is why we such a hated profession.

13.

jay
Dec 19, 2008 11:27 AM CST

Comment removed by moderator.

14.

Unimpressed
Dec 19, 2008 12:07 PM CST

You marathon nuts are the idiots—no one takes you people seriously, except for others in the “I’m running a marathon” club.  I was in the Army and we had to run a 2-mile every year as part of our annual physical training test.  I bet most marathon runners couldn’t do it in the time required.  This is all a joke and you marathon runners need to get a life.  On the other hand, triathletes, who train far more rigorously, actually run to win, so I have much more respect for them.

15.

ForrestDump
Dec 19, 2008 12:10 PM CST

Well, “Impressed,” I could run a marathon and do so in a heck of a lot less than 5 hrs.  Woo hoo for me.  If by “tremendous accomplishment” you mean “pointless waste of time by a boring tool who obviously has nothing better to do with his life,” then yeah, I agree 100%.  Frankly I feel sorry for the guy; he’s 64 and surely loaded, and this is the best thing he can find to do with his time?? His wife, kids, and grandkids must just adore him.  Seriously, though, I do not see how this is possible, not from a physical standpoint (if he’s “running” them in 5 to 8 hrs, he IS essentially walking; anyone who is not grossly obese or disabled can walk 3.25 mph, that’s barely a brisk stroll) but from a time standpoint. Unless San Antonio holds 100 marathons a year, he’s obviously traveling to do this; how could you travel to 2 marathons a week, 52 wks a yr., let alone “train,” and still maintain a law practice.  I agree with the above comment, Akin should be embarassed about this and I would think their clients would be pissed that they’re paying Akin’s extravagant rates to support a partner like this.

16.

Alice
Dec 19, 2008 12:15 PM CST

This is self-absorption at its finest.  Nothing says “me! me! me!” like running marathons.  Go help the homeless or something!

17.

Unimpressed
Dec 19, 2008 12:23 PM CST

Ditto to ForrestGump:  I have a law school buddy who “ran” the L.A. Marathon a few years ago and, while walking the final mile to the finish line, strolled into a roadside MacDonald’s for a Big Mac.  A reporter noticed and asked him why he took a meal break, and my buddy with mouthful replied, “I’m hungry.”  He finished the race, has a “number” to prove it, and added it to his resume.  What an accomplishment!

18.

Seriously?
Dec 19, 2008 1:19 PM CST

I, like NeverDoneThisBefore, have never been compelled to comment, but some of the foregoing comments are bothersome. Perhaps this article didn’t deserve a spot in the ABA journal, maybe some of you think running a marathon is senseless, and sure, that many marathons might be excessive. But, did we really have to launch into attacks on people who run marathons in general.

Throughout law school and in my short time in this profession, I have found that many seem all to eager to jump at the chance to criticize others. It saddens me.  I never thought I would be criticize for running a marathon. It’s not for everyone, but it is an accomplishment, whether you break a record or shuffle. I have been a distance runner since I was 11 years old and running a marathon was an important goal. It is something some people love.

And who says I cannot help the homeless and run a marathon?

As a side note, a very good friend of my roommate passed away during the Dallas Marathon after collapsing at mile 21.  I have heard she had a big heart and wasn’t at al al “me!me! me!” type person.

19.

Brad
Dec 20, 2008 9:17 AM CST

While I have not run a marathon myself, I do many distance runs.  All the haters in the thread here are pretty amazing.  Most you idiots couldnt run a 5k let alone a marathon.  You are fat and out of shape and are jealous of people who are not.  I get it.  But the real story that these haters are like most ABA commenters where their animosity runs deeper.  They are jealous and envious of the older generation that they think had things “easier” and that they are upset that they will not have the money just handed to them and be “successful” and partner just because they have a JD.

But back on topic, a guy going out and being active, no matter how fast or slow is a good thing.  I’d love to see my father do this.  With that said, if he is doing 5-8 hour marathons, that is essentially walking and nothing special in its own right, but still an accomplishment.  For this guy, slow or not, doing 103 of them in a year is something special. 

As for marathoners or runners in general, I am generally in the top of most 5k’s I go and run.  I enjoy doing races because it is a great workout, short enough to not be boring, and it is fun.  Marathons are 10x that run because it is a festival atmosphere.  If you run one, actually run one, the training, non-stop running, and finishing is the one true accomplishment many people have in their lives that they tried for and attained. 

An for unimpressed, the Boston Marathon is not a joke.  You actually have to have qualifying times to get in that one.  You sir are a troll and an idiot.  Better luck next time.

20.

runner
Dec 20, 2008 9:51 AM CST

As an runner who has competed in every distance from 200 meters to 100 miles, I can say that a marathon is a special accomplishment.  For those of you who feel compelled to insult this man for simply participating in a marathon, consider that perhaps he tried to get this record because he wasn’t happy with just participating.  He knows that at age 64 he is not going to win or set any records, so he can try to accomplish something a little different.  If you still feel the need to criticize him, I urge you to enter a marathon, finish it in 5 hours, and do it again the next weekend.
Unimpressed:  I have run PT tests with military personnel, and I have always been able to not only beat the requirement, but continue to hold that pace for an entire marathon (and in case you were wondering, no, I can’t win any marathons that I have previously run).  I completely disagree with your assertion that triathletes are superior to runners in their dedication as well.  I don’t want to take anything away from triathletes, but I think that serious runners (not necessarily fast, but serious) are just as dedicated to their sport as the serious triathletes.
As far as time is concerned, yes, he does get to use a perk of his years of work to climb to the top of his profession in taking the time and money to compete in these, but who amongst us doesn’t use what little we may have to participate in an activity we love?  I would definitely rather he spend his time and money this way than shopping for porsches in Dubai.
Concerning training, for those who are convinced that one cannot seriously train for such an even while remaining a productive member of society, believe it or not, it is possible; all that is required is that dedication (but, then again, I guess we’re not all triathletes or army PT jockeys…)  I have trained for multiple events farther than a marathon, including a 100 mile footrace a month ago, while remaining in good standing in engineering graduate school, so I have some perspective on time management.  All that is required is good time management, which, as a seasoned lawyer, I’m sure he has learned over the years.
Regarding the “me! me! me!” aspect of the sport, you clearly do not know much about running.  99% of the training is alone, much of it at some unholy hour of the morning.  Most of us don’t run for a team, we don’t get anything for running, and we quite often compete at a considerable expense to ourselves (monetarily, physically, mentally, etc.)  I can’t speak for all, but I will say that, in general, I couldn’t care any less whether or not anyone sees me in any given race (there were maybe 5 people at the finish line of my 100-miler in November).  All that being said, running at the record-setting level, which is exactly what he has done, requires a deep internal drive, because if external motivation and reinforcement is what you’re after in this sport, you’ll quickly learn that you’re in the wrong sport.
In any case, anyone who speaks ill of this man needs to grow up, find something to use as a goal (as he did at age 63), and quit criticizing people who are out there doing something in order to make yourself feel better about your own pathetic insecurities.

21.

Johnny
Dec 20, 2008 3:28 PM CST

Good for him! I’m proud of my fellow lawyer. I’m 63 and ran 15 marathons last year with a best time of 3:26. I thought that was something until I heard about this guy! The cost of running 105 marathons must have been astronomical. I wonder what kind of training he did in between races?

22.

21 marathon lawyer
Dec 20, 2008 6:38 PM CST

I know what it takes to run a marathon; I’ve run a few while practicing law full time.  My hat is off to Mr. Macon, next to whom I feel completely inadequate. . . as a runner.  Chances are he didn’t set off to accomplish this goal for the glory of (or criticism seen here, for that matter) it but rather to know that he could do it.  The same reason many of us ran our first marathons.

Khalid Kannouchi said it best after his first Chicago Marathon victory.  He saluted the 4+ hour marathon runners (yes, we are RUNNING for more than 4 hours) when he said that we impressed him because we were doing something he could not . . . running 4 hours.

23.

Aaron Rich
Dec 20, 2008 9:25 PM CST

Unimpressed: Please post the time that the Army required that you run 2 miles in.  I guarantee that I could run that pace for at least 15 miles.  Marathoners don’t need to run a fast 2 mile run to train for a marathon.  I have respect for the military, but don’t tell me about a 2 mile PT run being comparable to a marathon.

24.

kevin christopher
Dec 21, 2008 12:00 AM CST

1. In response to the time better spent ‘feeding the homeless’, consider that most every marathon is a fundraiser for some sort of charitable organization. Doubtless, he contributed 50k to 100k of his own entry money in addition to the sponsorship funds directed towards various charities.
2. Consider that he is likely more valuable than any person in his firm this year. Likely, the San Antonio press has featured articles indirectly plugging the firm for this man’s achievement. Additionally, his national networking is an invaluable marketing tool for the firm. Of much greater value to all than some frosh overpayed associate that knows little beyond ramming for irrelevant law school exams.
All you naggering nabobs of negativity are seriously disturbed. HE RAN A HUNDRED FRIGGIN MARATHONS IN A YEAR! Get over your spite before it eats your souls.

25.

my56thchoice
Dec 21, 2008 3:10 PM CST

It seems that many lawyers refuse to take any attorney seriously unless he or she has no passionate hobby outside the law.  Some seem to view any substantial outside hobby to be some sort of “divided loyalty”.  It is as if a lawyer with more than a passing interest in anything outside the law were unlikely to have sufficient focus for the job. 

Would a Chess Grandmaster just out of Yale Law School get fewer offers if he put his Grandmaster title on his resume?  Is it better to hire someone who doesn’t love Chess so much? 

In today’s legal environment it may seem to many lawyers that as long as they don’t commit malpractice, only the speed and volume of their work matters.  Believe it or not, however, not every attorney’s contribution to his firm is measured that way. 

Maybe the partner this article writes about, is a fantastic “rainmaker” or a brilliant legal writer.  Or maybe he simply has a tremendous financial stake in his firm.  Does it matter?  What ever his contribution is we can assume that he would not still be a partner there if he didn’t “pull his weight”, however his firm measures the value of partners.  Why must people assume that because he apparently spends so much time out of the office he is dead weight to his firm?

26.

Allen Scheketovits
Dec 22, 2008 7:35 AM CST

Comment removed by moderator.

27.

R
Dec 22, 2008 8:59 AM CST

I was going to write some joke - surprised no one else has yet - about him obviously being the “Gump” in Akin Gump…

But geez louise, what a bunch of HATERS on this thread! Look, I’m a poor government lawyer and have run one marathon in my life (in just over 4 hours). I will bet that not a SINGLE one of the haters who have written on this thread has EVER run a marathon in their life. I will not run another one because the training took so long.

But once you get up to running 100 marathons a year, the marathon events ARE the training, I’d imagine…

These horrible people casting aspersions on this lawyer’s ethics and integrity should be ashamed of themselves! Outrageous! THEY and not the runner are the true embarrassment to our profession.

There are many accomplished people who pack enormous amounts of activity into 24 hours. This gentleman is obviously one of those types. I’m not, but with role models like him our world is a better place.

28.

Unimpressed
Dec 22, 2008 10:07 AM CST

I’m not going to respond seriatim to each of these posts, which are based largely upon the “you don’t know what you are talking about since you have never run a marathon”; and “you must be a troll and overweight,” blah, blah, blah.

First, PT tests in the military require far more rigorous training than most of the marathons, with the notable exception of a 5k, which, I admit is likely more competitive than the others because there is a potential for winning and the participants are generally in better shape physically (which I am, btw, at 42, 5.9, 170 lbs. and I work out at least three times per week in a gym).  I’m a lawyer—i.e., competed in school all my life (played football and basketball) and went to a top college and law school, entered BigLaw and am aggressive by nature; unless I join an athletic competition to win, it’s a waste of my time.  My motto is:  if you aren’t in it to win, get out of the way!  I’ve never run a marathon because I don’t believe it is healthy for the body, and find most marathon runners to be narcissistic, self-absorbed baby-boomers.

The Boston Marathon has a qualifying test, but it’s not that difficult and virtually everyone who applies ends up qualifying.  In particular that marathon attracts largely over-40-somethings who are fulfilling some mid-life crisis-precipitated goal of finally “running the Boston Marathon”—woo hoo!  By running with hoards of other runners, they convince themselves they are accomplishing something by the simple fact others are doing it; hey, if we are all doing it, it must be really, really important!  In reality, the only ones impressed are the runners themselves. (And thanks for all of you idiots who fly into Boston and spend your dollars here; we need the money!)  I’m impressed only by the Kenyans and other Africans who are in it to win; good for them.  As for the others, get a life.  If you want to give to charity, give to charity and don’t try enticing others to do what they should do rather than waiting for an excuse to give.

Finally, as has been proven time and time again, distance running is bad for one’s health, and to the person whose friend collapsed, he obviously ignored the warnings from his and other doctors.  The world is replete with similar stories about distance runners collapsing during marathons; what a tragic and completely avoidable way to end one’s life.  Distance running in particular ravages and is very bad for the knees and cardiovascular system.  Humans were not born to run marathons.  Even the military tacitly recognizes that the 2-mile is not healthy for the troops, with the exception of the teenagers and 20-somethings whose bodies can take the abuse.  The 2-mile is really a way of testing the short-term endurance of the troops.  For long-term endurance, we marched (i.e., walked) with our packs and weapons.  Try carrying an M-16 for several miles in full battle dress uniform, rucksack, canteen, Kevlar and BOOTS in the heat and humidity of Virginia in the summertime and you will quickly learn about endurance.  If you want to exercise, try walking, not even briskly, just walking a few miles a day; that’s far more effective than “training” for a marathon no one really cares about other than members of the marathon lonely hearts club.

29.

SJB
Dec 22, 2008 10:45 AM CST

Given the number and nature of his comments, Mr. Unimpressed sure seems to be impressed with himself and the absolute correctness and authoritativeness of his views.  Like many in this profession to which I belong, Mr. Unimpressed strikes me as being totally devoid of of joy, humility and grace, and has replaced these nobler qualities with surley bombast and negativity, and the belief that the power of his own ego will carry the day in any argument.  And, of course, he must convert every discussion to an argument, and win every argument.  Very sad.  Sad as well that the more Mr. Unimpressed argues his points, the more his true ignorance shows, not just from a factual standpoint, but an experiential one as well.  Happy Holidays, Mr. Unimpressed!

30.

julien
Dec 22, 2008 10:48 AM CST

In response to the comments that Mr. Macon doesn’t work, doesn’t bill hours, I can say that’s 100% false.  I know many former Akin Gumpers in San Antonio where Macon is based.  They are all uniform in stating that Macon is a workaholic.  He is known throughout the firm for his relentless work ethic.  He regularly bills 2,400 hours a year as a partner.  His ethic is incredible.  All he does is work and run.  Any problems the firm has are not because Larry Macon doesn’t work.

31.

jgaither
Dec 22, 2008 11:04 AM CST

Please make sure you know something before you make a medicinal comment.  Im a physical therapist and distance running is great for ones health.  Those who have died have had cardiovascular problems that were caused OUTSIDE of the marathon and training.  As for it being bad on the knees that is the complete opposite, you builld higher bone density and increased joint strength from running distance.  The injuries arise from inexperienced people not acclimating to the repetitive stress in an adequate amount of time.  Also the boston marathon is for more than just 40 something in a midlife crisis.  I qualified with a 2:37 with is apporximately a 6:00 pace which i know easily completes the “grueling” 2 mile PT test. And im clearly not in it to win it, seeing as how the womens best are passing me by and leaving me in the dust.  The Boston marathon is tough to qualify for most who arent as into running as i am, and even if they are 7:10 pace for the 30 and under age group is still quite demanding for anyone.  Stick to law, or qualify for boston than come back and let us know how “easy” it is.

32.

Craig Stokes
Dec 23, 2008 6:59 AM CST

I have known Larry Macon for over 20 years, as opposing counsel. While I have never worked in the same firm with him, I know that his work ethic matches his marathon ethic; he serves his clients well.  I just concluded a case against him earlier this year.  While I know nothing about running, I do know this man is a great trial attorney.

33.

VG
Dec 24, 2008 1:33 PM CST

Here we have a wonderful story and a great accomplishment. Being both a lawyer and an endurance athlete (though I prefer cycling), I am frankly disturbed by the comments which I have read.  What disturbs me is that all I feel for those of you, who criticize the man for what he’s done, is pity, for only those, who have nothing to show for their miserable existence on this earth, go out of their way to diminish the accomplishments of their fellow men and colleagues.

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.