Copyright Law

Both Sides Prefer a Third Trial in Music-Sharing Case


The Recording Industry Association of America would rather gamble on a third trial on damages than accept a judge’s drastically reduced award in a case against a Minnesota woman who shared 24 songs over the Internet.

Lawyers for the defendant, Jammie Thomas-Rasset, apparently feel the same way. They rejected a settlement offer of $25,000, to be paid to a charity for struggling musicians, according to the Associated Press. The RIAA then opted for the third trial.

Last week U.S. District Judge Michael Davis slashed the $1.92 million award to $54,000, saying the higher amount was “monstrous and shocking.” At the time, the defendant, Jammie Thomas-Rasset, had said the lower amount was still more than she could pay.

The RIAA made the settlement offer in a letter to Thomas-Rasset’s lawyers, the AP story says. Joe Sibley, a lawyer for Thomas-Rasset, said his client would continue the fight on principle. After damages are finalized, he plans an appeal arguing statutes authorizing hefty damages for file sharing are unconstitutional.

Thomas-Rasset had also turned down previous settlement offers of $3,000 and $5,000.

Previous:
ABA and Reed Smith File Briefs Urging Supreme Court to Hear Privilege Case

Next:
iPad Name Also Claimed by Fujitsu and Bra Maker


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.