Law Firms
Buchanan Ingersoll Sees ‘Rash’ of Lawyer Departures, Drop in Associate Hours
Posted Aug 13, 2008 8:05 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney appears to be experiencing some growing pains.
The Pittsburgh-based law firm has merged with several law firms in the past several years, including 120-lawyer Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling, also based in Pittsburgh, Legal Times reports. In 2006, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney finally made American Lawyer’s list of top 100 law firms.
But lately Buchanan Ingersoll has been hit by a “rash” of 35 lawyer and lobbyist departures, the story says, as well as a drop in work.
Barely a quarter of the firm’s lawyers have met billable hours goals and average associate hours are less than 1,650 a year, the story says. Citing the firm’s Shareholder Business Report, the story also says the firm is $10.5 million below its billing goals.
Former partners told Legal Times that the firm has not shown an adequate commitment to its satellite offices. A legal recruiter, on the other hand, sees a different problem with those offices.
“There was a tremendous amount of jealousy and rivalry that existed between Pittsburgh and the branch offices, with the guys in Pittsburgh believing the branch offices were taking out too much money,” said Jerry Kowalski of Highland Legal Research in New York, a former recruiter for the firm. The result is a lot of unhappiness.
“I don’t believe there is anybody [at Buchanan] who has any potential of moving who doesn’t have his résumé out there,” Kowalski told Legal Times.
In the law firm’s Miami offices, nine lawyers moved to Foley & Lardner, leaving behind only six lawyers occupying a floor and a half of office space. In New York, turnover has exceeded 60 percent since the beginning of 2007.
Chief executive officer Thomas VanKirk characterizes some of the departures as housecleaning, a comment echoed by Edward Allera, co-managing partner of the firm’s Washington, D.C., office. “You’ve got to produce, and we’ve become more and more demanding,” Allera told the publication. “Perhaps this wasn’t the optimal forum for a number of people.”
VanKirk said the firm is doing well despite the financial downturn, with an increase in revenue of 3.4 percent this year. “It was a terrible four months for the profession, and we’re still ahead on a bottom-line basis,” he told Legal Times. Last year the firm had fewer partners but higher profits per partner.

Comments
Jordan Ross
Aug 21, 2008 2:14 PM CST
This article was balanced in general but I think the tone would have been very different had it led with Tom VanKirk’s comments. In the final analysis we see that Buchanan Ingersoll is not sitting still in a tough economy and a more competitive global marketplace. I’m very much reminded of the uproar when Sidley Austin decided to prune the dead wood from their firm. The root cause of this sort of controversy throughout the legal industry is an outdated business model in too many firms that tolerates a compensation plan that allows partners who may have been rock stars in the 1980’s play golf, go to lunch and take home home the profits of younger more productive partners. Bottom line - times are tough but Buchanan has nonetheless increased revenue and profits per partner.
Jordan Ross, Principal
Ross Legal Search, LLC
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.