• Home
  • News
  • CIA Lawyers Gave Written OK to Destroy Tapes

Guantanamo/Detainees

CIA Lawyers Gave Written OK to Destroy Tapes

Posted Dec 11, 2007 6:31 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

CIA lawyers in the clandestine branch, known then as the Directorate of Operations, gave written approval to destroy two videotapes of interrogations of al-Qaida suspects, the New York Times reports.

A former intelligence official told the newspaper that Jose Rodriguez Jr., then the chief of the directorate, concluded he had the authority to destroy the tapes in November 2005 based on written advice from lawyers in the division.

The advice of the CIA lawyers was at odds with that of lawyers within the White House and the Justice Department, who advised the agency in 2003 that it should not destroy the tapes, the official said. But those lawyers never issued a direct order to that effect.

“They never told us, ‘Hell, no,’ ” he said.

The date of the destruction could be important. A motion filed on Sunday claims the CIA violated a protective order issued in June 2005 requiring the government to preserve evidence regarding torture and mistreatment of Guantanamo detainees.

In a separate case, lawyers for a different group of Guantanamo detainees filed a motion yesterday that says they notified the CIA of a judge's order forbidding destruction of potential evidence in July 2005, SCOTUSblog reports. The motion (PDF posted by SCOTUSblog) was filed with with U.S. District Judge Richard Roberts of Washington, D.C.

The Times story is now putting the date of destruction at November 2005 or after.

Current and former intelligence officials said CIA acting general counsel John Rizzo did not give final approval before the tapes’ destruction, although he had been involved in discussions about the issue.

CIA Director Michael Hayden is expected to testify today in a closed session before the Senate Intelligence Committee about the tapes’ destruction.

A former CIA officer is telling the Washington Post and ABC News that one of the destroyed videotapes shows the waterboarding of a top al-Qaida suspect. Ex-officer John Kiriakou said the simulated-drowning technique worked, helping foil several planned attacks.

Comments

1.

AC
Dec 14, 2007 8:28 AM CST

In the ABA’s continual rush to oppose and expose anything done by the Bush Administration, they, yet again, cite questionable sources to make a case for yet another “scandal.”

Since when is the “Times” a reputable source for information, especially on political issues?

My guess is that when the dust settles, this will be yet another non-issue (like the Plame affair, the attorney firings, etc.).  Oh well.

Oh, by the way, there are hundreds of millions of people in the world who would love to wipe us all out, have you heard about it?

Flag this comment

2.

Tim Larason
Dec 14, 2007 10:06 AM CST

Many of us do not consider the Plame affair and the attorney firings to be “non-issues.”  The current administration has dishonored our country.

Flag this comment

3.

George Sly
Dec 14, 2007 9:09 PM CST

I lost friends on 11 September 2001 and I am appalled that the alleged interrogation tactics and treatment of prisoners by my country has resulted in a massive propaganda victory for its enemies and dishonor to my country.
I would suggest EC read Brown v. Mississippi 297 U.S. 278, 287 (1936) wherein Mr. Chief Justice Hughes stated “‘Coercing the supposed state’s criminals into confessions and using such confessions so coerced from them against them in trials has been the curse of all countries. It was the chief iniquity, the crowning infamy of the Star Chamber, and the Inquisition, and other similar institutions. The Constitution recognized the evils that lay behind these practices and prohibited them in this country. * * * The duty of maintaining constitutional rights of a person on trial for his life rises above mere rules of procedure, and wherever the court is clearly satisfied that such violations exist, it will refuse to sanction such violations and will apply the corrective.’
Id. quoting Fisher v. State, 145 Miss. 116.  Brown is still good law and we who are lawyers and all other Americans are bound by it.

Flag this comment

4.

Nick
Dec 17, 2007 7:38 PM CST

AC - Thank you for implying that the Times is less reputable than the Bush administration.  You made my day.  Let me know when you find those WMD’s or whatever we went to war for.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.