Legal Malpractice
Clients, Law Firms Get ‘Savage’ As Legal Malpractice Claims Increase
Posted Feb 17, 2009 2:33 PM CST
By Rachel M. Zahorsky
"The first thing we do," said the character in Shakespeare's Henry VI, is "kill all the lawyers."
Attorney malpractice claims are escalating in numbers and intensity, making us wonder if clients, anxiously looking to recoup the hefty sums of money lost because of the struggling economy, are recalling the literal interpretation of Shakespeare’s well-known verse.
“Over the past several months, we have seen a dramatic increase in legal malpractice filings, a trend that would never been seen in a better economic environment,” Fisher, Rushmer, Werrenrath, Dickson, Talley & Dunlap shareholder John E. Fisher told the ABA Journal. “Now, more than ever, attorneys need to be mindful of their actions when dealing with clients."
In Florida, the depressed real estate market is driving many distressed buyers to look for any way out of housing contracts, including blaming their lawyers for their financial issues, said Mike Downey, a partner at Hinshaw & Culbertson.
“People are feeling a bit more desperate,” Downey said. Lawyers are delving into unfamiliar practice areas, and some clients are being less honest, putting attorneys at risk for professional liability issues, he added.
It’s not only clients who are spiteful. Downey said his phone is ringing with phone calls from lawyers complaining about malicious conduct from opposing counsel.
Chicago-based lawyer George B. Collins of Collins, Bargione & Vuckovich, agrees there is a meaner spirit to the recent spate of malpractice suits—and it’s aimed at unexpected targets. “The nastiness is hitting lawyers in substantial law firms, not the type of people you would expect to be in a malpractice suit,” Collins said. “It’s savage the way big firms are attacking each other.”
What advice is there for lawyers looking to protect their practices?
In addition to securing sufficient malpractice insurance, Collins cautioned lawyers against dabbling in practice areas outside of their expertise. "My main tip would be don't go where you don't belong."

Comments
B. McLeod
Feb 17, 2009 4:02 PM CST
One of the things that happens when the economy heads downward is that the so-called “good deal exemption” (i.e., dumb luck which may have covered years of incompetence on the part of sloppy transactional attorneys) dries up. Suddenly (like Big Law), the jig is up, the ship is aground, and the emperor has no clothes. When clients realize how much money they’ve been overpaying to third rate rubes for defective work product, they start to get plumb, mad dog, fighting mean.
Flag this comment
Deebs
Feb 20, 2009 8:32 AM CST
It is not just the paying clients - it is the one’s who are on a contingency basis, and the claim does not merit what they believe it to be worth.
Flag this comment
legal.mal.defense.attorney
Feb 20, 2009 9:07 AM CST
Best advice—don’t sue any client for fees until the statute of limitations for malpractice runs - the number of malpractice claims filed as a knee-jerk cross-complaint to a fees claim is huge—Even if you think you can’t—wait!
Flag this comment
atty
Feb 20, 2009 9:16 AM CST
Suits for fees remove the restrictions on limitations for malpractice in some places. It is a common counter-claim and must be thoroughly evaluated. However, waiting won’t help everywhere.
Flag this comment
Adam
Feb 20, 2009 9:28 AM CST
I can’t believe my comment on the Scalia article (which contained no profanity but was very disrespectful of Scalia…isn’t that my 1st Amendment Right? aren’t WE ALL ABOUT rights???) got removed by the moderator, while another commentor used the word “MILF” which was allowed to stand. The ABA apparently is more ideologically selective than concerned for decency!
Flag this comment
THe Avenger
Feb 20, 2009 9:38 AM CST
Amen to #1…handling a multi-million dollar malpractice case that is exactly that. Seems Big Law has a curious inability to spot their own malpractice/conflicts/ineptitude inversely related to their ability to see billing opportunities.
Flag this comment
The Avenger
Feb 20, 2009 9:42 AM CST
Adam - #5,
It’s not ideological…just nitpicky ‘eye of the beholder’ moderation. I got stricken for a ‘tongue in cheek’ comment on Breyer a few months back. The moderator, I guess, has never googled MILF before…
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Feb 20, 2009 11:23 AM CST
In the old days, the rule of thumb was “never sue a client for fees,” period. Lawyers have moved away from that somewhat, and I have seen a lot of it happening in the last six or seven years. Often, it does not end happily for the lawyer, as the posters at 3 and 4 point out. Whether or not client complaints about work quality and fee levels are sustained, it is purely poisonous PR to get mired in a public fee dispute. Even if the bill is five figures, it may be wiser to just write off that receivable and move on down the road. If your unpaid work was good and successful work, the client will eventually come back for more (and that is when you remind them about your unpaid statement, and also request an ample retainer for any new services).
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.