Legal Ethics

Criminal Defense Lawyer Awaits Penalty for Telling Judge His Client Confessed to a Shooting


A veteran Michigan criminal defense lawyer is awaiting a decision on how he will be penalized following a legal ethics ruling that found he had violated a fundamental principle of legal ethics by revealing in open court that his client had confessed to a shooting as the two argued during a sentencing hearing.

A lawyer for Robert Slameka says the Attorney Discipline Board should give him a reprimand, at most, after dismissing three charges against him, reports the Detroit Free Press.

However, Slameka has a discipline history that includes four reprimands and 11 admonishments over the past 25 years.

Given that record, “It would make an unusual precedent if they don’t order a suspension,” says law professor Larry Dubin of the University of Detroit-Mercy.

Previous:
Ruden McClosky is Reportedly Deep in Merger Discussions With Benesch Firm

Next:
Ice Miller to Gain Another 90 Attorneys By Merging With Schottenstein Zox


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.