• Home
  • News
  • Conn. Disciplinary Counsel Targets Website for Lawyer Referrals

Legal Ethics

Conn. Disciplinary Counsel Targets Website for Lawyer Referrals

Posted Jul 27, 2009 7:19 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Local grievance panels in Connecticut have found probable cause of an ethics violation by two lawyers who entered into agreements with a bankruptcy website that sends potential clients their way.

The ethics probe was the result of a complaint by Norwich bankruptcy lawyer Zenas Zelotes, who contends a bankruptcy website operated by TotalAttorneys Inc. pays for referrals in violation of ethics rules, state laws and federal bankruptcy laws, the Connecticut Law Tribune (sub. req.) reports. Lawyers who sign contracts with the website, www.clearbankruptcy.com, have to pay $65 for every person who contacts them through the service, according to Zelotes. The company operates about a dozen websites in all, Zelotes says, for different practice areas.

Zelotes filed the complaint after a TotalAttorneys marketing representative contacted him. He said the website is taking business away from lawyers who don’t participate. “I felt something significant had to be done,” Zelotes told the Law Tribune.

Connecticut chief disciplinary counsel Mark Dubois told the Law Tribune there are ethical problems with the arrangement if the fees paid by the lawyers well exceed the costs of operation. TotalAttorneys counters that the fee covers operational costs and support services, and its website is an example of co-op advertising. The website is not a referral service, its founder Kevin Chern argues, because the call center doesn’t screen for potential clients, but rather makes connections based on their location.

Dubois has raised a second ethics issue. “The advertising rules here require there to be the name of a Connecticut-admitted lawyer on the ad and that lawyer has to file the ad with the grievance committee for review,” which hasn’t happened, he told the Law Tribune.

Probable cause findings were issued against two Connecticut lawyers, Kenneth Lenz of Orange and Steven Lesko of Old Saybrook, the story says. Lesko’s answer to the complaint said he reviewed state ethics rules and federal bankruptcy laws and was satisfied that his agreement with TotalAttorneys was legal, according to the story.

But Lesko had another problem with the website. He says he paid $455 for contracts over two months, but never retained a client or collected any fees as a result.

TotalAttorneys has posted its arguments at this link.

Updated at 12:37 p.m. CT to include link to TotalAttorneys materials.

Comments

1.

Abraham Ben Judea
Jul 27, 2009 8:08 AM CST

Comment removed by moderator.

Flag this comment

2.

Kevin Chern
Jul 27, 2009 8:55 AM CST

While I recognize that the ABA can only devote so much attention to any one story, if you are interested in seeing the Zelotes complaint, the response by Total Attorneys and a summary of the arguments advanced, you can visit http://www.totalattorneys.com/blog/pay-per-performance-marketing-under-attack-total-attorneys-responds/

Flag this comment

3.

Paul the Magyar
Jul 27, 2009 10:36 AM CST

The logic of the argument is flawed.  Tax protestors are akin to Don Quixote, with the added risk of having the IRS pursue them to the end of the earth.  If you do not like the benefits of American society and government, think about moving to another country with another tax system.  Most of the countries that tax less than America also offer fewer benefits to their citizens.  In other words, you get what you pay for.

Flag this comment

4.

Abraham Ben Judea
Jul 27, 2009 11:01 AM CST

Comment removed by moderator.

Flag this comment

5.

Abrahan Ben Judea
Jul 27, 2009 2:56 PM CST

To comeenter #3 you bet I’ll move no one in C.A gets evicted from their home, when old and sick, the land and farm is yours and your childrens. like it was here before the passing of the 16th Admendment early 20th century. no doubt some people have a shallow knowledge of words. I bet that very few readers here, maybe 1 in 5K know the difference between a direct tax and indirect taxation.  Do you?The worst thing that can happen to a blogsite is to have an onion skin moderator.

Flag this comment

6.

B. McLeod
Jul 29, 2009 10:51 AM CST

“Stand and deliver” is “direct,” and the ones we don’t know we’re paying, but which are bundled in product/service costs we pay are “indirect”?

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.