Criminal Justice

Defendants Dispute Hate Designation


Three men accused of a hate crime for targeting a gay man for a robbery say they shouldn’t be charged under the New York law because there was no hate involved.

Gerald J. Di Chiara, the lawyer for the defendants, says his clients didn’t dislike gays, Clyde Haberman writes in a column for the New York Times. They are accused of targeting the victim, Michael Sandy, in belief that a gay man wouldn’t put up a fight if they robbed him in search of money and drugs.

Sandy ran away from the men and was hit by a car. The defendants are charged with murder and murder as a hate crime.

Prosecutors say that making someone a target because of sexual orientation satisfies the law’s requirements. Judge Jill Konviser-Levine will rule in the dispute.

Previous:
Warhol Painting Dispute Decided

Next:
Wales Lawyer Pens Life-Based Thrillers


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.