• Home
  • News
  • Did BigLaw Snag Twitter Usernames, or Were They ‘Twitterjacked’?

Law Firms

Did BigLaw Snag Twitter Usernames, or Were They ‘Twitterjacked’?

Posted Jul 17, 2009 3:53 PM CST
By Martha Neil

Are some BigLaw firms suddenly Twitter-savvy? Or might someone else have seen an opportunity to "Twitterjack," after a law blogger pointed in a 2008 Securities Docket post to 35 available Twitter usernames that major legal partnerships should want to lock up?

Those are the questions posed in a Legal Blog Watch post today by Bruce Carton, a Securities Docket editor writing a guest column.

As yet, the answers apparently aren't known. Given the 100 percent registration between November and December 2008, of all 35 of the Twitter usernames to which Carton pointed in his earlier post (they included, for instance, @dlapiper, @jonesday and @akingump), Carton writes, he fears that Twitter-squatters may have gotten to work in snagging all of these brands.

So Carton has one final question: "BigLaw lawyers from these firms, do you think your firms care about this?"

Comments

1.

Marc E Hankin, Hankin Patent Law, APC
Jul 18, 2009 12:36 PM CST

Any law firm (or other entity) that DOES care about a TwitterSnagger should NOT pay any money, but rather, should go through Twitter to resolve the situation.  Twitter’s General Conditions, in this Terms of Service, provides:
“We reserve the right to reclaim usernames on behalf of businesses or individuals that hold legal claim or trademark on those usernames.”

Flag this comment

2.

Soji Elias
Jul 22, 2009 12:57 PM CST

How simple, Mr. Hankin. Well done.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.