• Home
  • News
  • DOJ to Hire 50 More Lawyers, Gear Up for Civil Rights Enforcement Drive

Attorney General

DOJ to Hire 50 More Lawyers, Gear Up for Civil Rights Enforcement Drive

Posted Sep 1, 2009 4:04 PM CST
By Martha Neil

The U.S. Department of Justice is gearing up for a renewed emphasis on traditional civil rights enforcement after a shift in focus during the administration of former President George W. Bush to a greater emphasis on religious rights, human trafficking and individual cases in which there was evidence of intentional discrimination.

Under Attorney General Eric Holder, the DOJ is planning to bring more disparate-impact cases based on statistical evidence that minorities are treated less favorably in arenas ranging from housing to hiring, reports the New York Times.

And, in addition to changing the direction of the Civil Rights Division, there are plans to hire another 50 civil rights lawyers to bolster a group that has suffered from morale and turnover problems under the Bush administration, the newspaper recounts. According to a confidential report by the Obama administration's transition team, 236 lawyers in the 350-attorney division left between 2003 and 2007, amidst publicized concerns that hiring and cases had been improperly politicized, with applicants' political views taking priority over their qualifications to do the job.

"While some of the political hires have performed competently and a number of others have left, the net effect of the politicized hiring process and the brain drain is an attorney workforce largely ill-equipped to handle the complex, big-impact litigation that should comprise a significant part” of the Civil Rights Division docket, states the transition report, a copy of which was obtained by the Times.

Now, however, the division's new direction is drawing fire from some who contend that the planned changes detailed in the lengthy Times article are also political, the newspaper reports.

Conservative Robert Driscoll, who worked as a political appointee from 2001 to 2003, says the "overwhelmingly left-leaning" career civil rights lawyers in the division can be counted upon to bring in others like themselves.

“If you are the Obama administration and you allow the career staff to do all the hiring, you will get the same people you would probably get if you did it yourself,” he tells the Times. “In some ways, it’s a masterstroke by them.”

Comments

1.

associate
Sep 1, 2009 4:31 PM CST

“disparate impact” and Sotomayor confirmed.


Think we’ll see any more Connecticut Firefighters cases?  This is no coincidence.

Flag this comment

2.

B. McLeod
Sep 2, 2009 6:36 AM CST

“Disparate impact” is a window the Court has left open.  It always has been an oddity in the sense that it is designed to try to show discrimination via “statistics” when there is no direct evidence of discrimination by anyone.  The key problem with the theory is the number of uncontrolled variables that make it difficult to rationally show whether “discrimination” or other variables are the cause of disparities.  Fortunately for lawyers, this will be like a government grant to the lawyer-laden cottage industry created in the 1990s to perform “disparity studies” for seven-figure sums, and there will be lots of complex litigation.  The cases tend to the same level of complexity as antitrust cases, and often go on for a decade or more.  Maybe this will be the BigLaw bailout plan.

Flag this comment

3.

joe
Sep 2, 2009 7:59 AM CST

If you want a job for life, work for the local, state or federal government.  You get 100k, 9 to 5 and retirement benefits off the chart.

Working for uncle sam is as close as you can come to winning the lottery.

Flag this comment

4.

J.D.
Sep 2, 2009 8:09 AM CST

I wonder what percentage of Eric Holder’s new lawyers will be anti-white, Black Panthers? Since the Obama Administration has coddled these racial supremacists, and since the Democrat Party has given the Black Panthers official positions, it’s a strong likelihood that the DoJ will be full of even more racists now.

Flag this comment

5.

associate
Sep 2, 2009 9:09 AM CST

Joe, McLeod, the cynic in me wants to apply for these jobs too.  Something tells me that I’m not “diverse” enough though, and I may have a disparate impact on the culture of the office.

Flag this comment

6.

Peter
Sep 2, 2009 11:48 AM CST

If you are white male, christian, or republican you need not apply.  You won’t get the job.

Flag this comment

7.

associate
Sep 2, 2009 11:54 AM CST

Peter, don’t you mean, “non-socialist”?  I don’t think “Republican” sufficiently encompasses the “non-diverse” group well enough as I’m sure libertarians, constitutionalists, and moderate dems need not apply either.

Flag this comment

8.

James
Sep 2, 2009 11:55 AM CST

#6

Only until the messiah and his cronies are out of office.  At some point government hiring will have to go back to merit.

Flag this comment

9.

Pedro
Sep 2, 2009 2:22 PM CST

We all know political appointments go to the victor.  Stop complaining.  Obama can appoint Obama Jr. for all that matters.

If you want to appoint your friends.  Win the election.

We get 8 years of obama hand picked government workers. 

Stop crying.

Flag this comment

10.

associate
Sep 2, 2009 2:57 PM CST

Pedro, you must be from Illinois too.  I’m told that in other states, non-appointee staff are sometimes hired based on merit instead of “recommendations”.  Those other places are just whacky, huh?

Flag this comment

11.

J.D.
Sep 2, 2009 3:02 PM CST

Am I the only one who fears “civil rights enforcement drive” is Orwellian double-speak?

Flag this comment

12.

S. Ray DeRusse
Sep 7, 2009 5:03 PM CST

Maybe now that a new administration is in place more committed to civil rights we can revisit the complaints inappropriately dismissed during the last administration.

http://www.bccmeteorites.com/misconduct-planetary.html

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.