Evidence
DOJ’s Corruption Unit a Mess After Stevens Case
Posted Jun 18, 2009 4:05 AM CST
By Molly McDonough
The Justice Department is still reeling from the abandoned corruption prosecution of former U.S. Senator Ted Stevens.
And to top it off, the Washington Post reports that newly discovered evidence threatens to undermine other cases while the DOJ's Public Integrity Section changes personnel.
The Post reports specifically that the section's senior managers responsible for overseeing the Stevens case, William Welch and Brenda Morris, have been moved to other roles. This follows a transfer of two other lawyers who had worked on cases alleging influence peddling in Alaska.
A new team of prosecutors and FBI agents reviewing discovery in the Alaska cases reported to the court that they'll complete their task by July 31. And they're already producing documents that they have determined should have been turned over to defense lawyers long ago.
One defense lawyer, John Henry Browne, who represents Alaska lawmaker Victor Kohring, thought he would get a dozen or so documents. But he's now sorting through a stack of more than 1,000 pages.
"There are a number of smoking guns in here," Browne is quoted saying. He added that he wouldn't be surprised if the DOJ dismissed cases rather than expose the case's former prosecutors to cross-examination about why they failed to share documents.
Previous posts at ABAJournal.com:
New DOJ Evidence Debacle: AG Says Gov’t Disclosure Dubious in 2 More Alaska Cases
Inexperience and Staffing Problems Plagued Stevens Prosecutors

Comments
associate
Jun 18, 2009 8:48 AM CST
MOVED? We’re talking about people playing fast and loose with other’s freedom here and they’re KEEPING their jobs?
Just wow.
Gubment, lala land is always so interesting.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Jun 18, 2009 8:59 AM CST
Obviously, the “corruption unit” was even more of a mess before and during the Stevens case. I am amazed at the extent to which DOJ actually formalized the function of being corrupt (around here, it is usually just handled piecemeal by rogue lawyers on the periphery of reputable practice). However, I see a concept here that could really provide a Keynesian shot-in-the-arm for the economy. Having already stocked up on lawyers to handle the corruption, and lawyers to cover up the corruption, now DOJ is shelling out for more lawyers to investigate the corruption. Meanwhile (as the prior poster points out), we have moved the lawyers who were the genesis of the program elsewhere, to begin the cycle anew. In the event that the already extant scandal leads to any formal charges, further tax outlays will be needed to cover the costs of the lawyers who prosecute and the lawyers who defend the defendant lawyers.
Feeding Frenzy!!! (Best of all possible worlds).
Flag this comment
George Patsourakos
Jun 18, 2009 9:14 AM CST
The Justice Department needs to get its act together to speed up the corruption trial of former U.S. Senator Ted Stevens. Moreover, the Justice Department must not dismiss this case, in order to avoid cross examination of the former prosecutors about why they failed to share documents. A more realistic action would be to fire these prosecutors for incompetence.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.