E-Discovery Malpractice Is More Common Than Perceived, LeClairRyan Partner Says

Lawyers beware: the pitfalls of e-discovery may be more complicated than many litigators—even experienced partners—expect or are prepared to handle.

“In short, this is a complex, high-risk task that requires specialized skills and experience. It is not something one does once a year and gets good at,” LeClairRyan partner Dennis Kiker wrote at The e-Discovery Myth. Kiker’s post started with a mention of a malpractice suit against McDermott Will & Emery for alleged failures in managing an e-discovery case that resulted in the inadvertent disclosure of over 3,000 privileged documents.

“E-discovery is a discipline. Far too many attorneys in firms large and small think that e-discovery is something they can do on the side, when they are not drafting motions to dismiss an antitrust class action or preparing to depose a scientist in a patent infringement matter,” Kiker wrote. “Unfortunately, this is simply not true.”

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy and the ABA Code of Conduct.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.