Criminal Justice
Fake Lawyer Convicted, Faces Up to 25 Years in Prison
Posted Apr 16, 2009 5:10 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
A man who duped clients and colleagues into believing he was a lawyer has been convicted of mail fraud and making false statements about his ability to practice law.
A federal jury in Bismarck, N.D., convicted Howard O. Kieffer after deliberating just an hour and a half, the Associated Press reports. Two witnesses testified they each paid Kieffer at least $20,000 to represent loved ones in appeals, the story says. And two lawyers testified they vouched for Kieffer on applications to practice law in the federal courts because he appeared to be an expert on sentencing matters.
In just the past four years, Kieffer represented at least 18 federal defendants, filing motions in 12 states, according to an ABA Journal story published in April. In 2007 and 2008 alone, he earned at least $92,000 in legal fees, according to court records.
Kieffer could be sentenced up to 25 years in prison and could be fined $500,000, the AP story says.
U.S. Attorney Drew Wrigley said the case has forced federal courts to review their procedures for admitting lawyers to practice, according to a separate Associated Press story.
Few federal courts verify information provided by out-of-state counsel in pro hac vice motions or circuit bar applications, according to an ABA Journal Web extra. The procedures vary by court.

Comments
B. McLeod
Apr 16, 2009 7:30 AM CST
Now, he will know even more about sentencing matters. His great error was in failing to locate some shyster bottomfeeder with a license, to whom he could have legitimately acted as a “consultant and paralegal” on sentencing matters (to their great, mutual profit). Sometimes, you really do need the “middleman.”
Flag this comment
PubliusEsq
Apr 16, 2009 9:43 AM CST
Well if he was an unlicensed Indian attorney working for an American Corp. he would have the ABA’s blessing to practice law. The main problem this guy had was that he was not working for Citicorp.
Flag this comment
fed up
Apr 16, 2009 10:42 AM CST
Back in the old days all you needed to practice law was the ability to speak before a court and find clients. Kieffer has apparently done both quite convincingly, and likely better than the many nit-wit lawyers with actual law degrees that I have hired in the past. I say give him an honorary law degree, and if he passes the bar exam, no harm, no foul. Of course, that will never happen because the bar protects its turf. As for the federal courts letting him slip through, that is hilarious! Jurisprudence in this country is a joke.
Flag this comment
R. Levine
Apr 16, 2009 6:41 PM CST
This is one very smart guy. He TAUGHT lawyers at Court sponsored - and ABA sponsored seminars. These lawyers constanly peppered him with questions. Now, will they step up and assist him expertly? For someone who gave so much to the federal defense/sentencing bar, where is that bar in supporting him?
Flag this comment
J.D.
Apr 24, 2009 9:04 AM CST
He should have helped with terrorist plots against the U.S.—the ACLU, CAIR, and others would have gotten him much less time in jail.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.