• Home
  • News
  • Federal Courts Need More Money, Judge Tells Congressional Subcommittee

Legislation & Lobbying

Federal Courts Need More Money, Judge Tells Congressional Subcommittee

Posted Mar 19, 2009 12:41 PM CST
By Martha Neil

Bankruptcy filings are already up, and with the increased focus on fraud because of the economic crisis, federal criminal cases may soon rise, too.

So the federal courts need more money, for this and other reasons, Judge Julia Smith Gibbons told a House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government today.

“The economic situation we face is far-reaching and affects all aspects of the Judiciary’s work,” said Gibbons, who sits on the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. “Courts provide a forum for individuals or companies who are forced to file bankruptcy proceedings, for those who have suffered losses and are seeking civil monetary remedies, and for those accused of crimes.”

Gibbons appeared with James Duff, director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, to seek an 8.7 percent increase in the federal courts' budget for the 2010 fiscal year, to $7.03 billion, reports a U.S. Courts press release.

Costs such as salaries, benefits, rent and Criminal Justice Act representations account for much of the increase and cannot easily be changed, the press release says. One line item in the requested funding raise, though, may be of particular interest to a number of lawyers: There is an effort afoot to up the ante on the hourly rate paid to panel attorneys in non-capital cases from $114 to $142.

Comments

1.

J.D.
Mar 19, 2009 1:51 PM CST

Also, the federal courts have been swamped with massive increases in immigration cases—a natural result of open borders. But it’s job security for immigration attorneys which explains why they don’t ever advocate for the rule of law.

2.

csc
Mar 19, 2009 2:16 PM CST

J.D.: You really do make the most illogical, twisted arguments which have absolutely nothing to do with the articles.  Just another bitter, conservative spewing hate and intolerance ….

3.

J.D.
Mar 19, 2009 3:44 PM CST

^ Thank you for the detailed, eloquent response. You truly have informed us.

BTW, if you don’t understand that our federal courts have struggled to keep up with workloads as a result of increased immigration lawsuits, you have not been following the news. The judge in this article says the courts need money not only because of new bankruptcy filings, but also “for other reasons.”

I’m just describing one of those other “reasons.”

Does that make me “bitter,” “illogical” “twisted,” “conservative,” “hateful,” and “intolerant?”

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.