Consumer Law
Fed’l Judge Casts Cold Eye on Lawyer’s ‘Simply Ridiculous’ Shrimp Claim
Posted Aug 11, 2009 6:03 PM CST
By Martha Neil
When Marc Verzani purchased a 16-ounce shrimp platter at Costco in February, the New York lawyer noticed something seemingly a bit fishy.
As further investigation confirmed, the platter—and others like it nationwide—allegedly contained less than one pound of the tasty crustaceans. So Verzani retained an attorney and filed a federal class action over the claimed weight discrepancy.
However, the judge overseeing the case is apparently seeing a different kind of deficiency, according to the New York Post:
"A reasonable consumer would understand that purchasing a ready-to-serve, prepackaged convenience item is different than purchasing shrimp at a fish counter, cocktail sauce in a jar and a lemon at the produce department," writes U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon in a ruling refusing a preliminary injunction against Costco in the shrimp claim she describes as "simply ridiculous."
That's because the label clearly "took into account both the shrimp and the sauce, never mind the lemon wedges and lettuce also included in the package," the judge writes.
Verzani plans to appeal the judge's ruling, according to the Post.
The SF Weekly blog provides a link to the March 2009 complaint (PDF), which was filed in the Southern District of New York.
Additional coverage:
Seafood Source: "Costco sued over short-weighted shrimp"
Wallet Pop: "Lawyer loses lawsuit over Costco shrimp, plans to appeal"

Comments
solo attyy
Aug 11, 2009 8:30 PM CST
outrageous that this judge and the legal media would call this suit ridiculous.
We need a lot more of this sort of lawsuit.
The federal judges are our unelected elite dictators.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Aug 11, 2009 10:43 PM CST
Ridiculous that a poster would call the assessment by the judge and the legal media outrageous. If the label didn’t specifically say there were 16 oz of shrimp, there is no error in the label. So, let’s not make a federal case out of it.
Flag this comment
Guano Dubango
Aug 12, 2009 4:44 AM CST
Comment removed by moderator.
Flag this comment
NYC Consumer
Aug 12, 2009 1:08 PM CST
Regrettably there is no longer a credible consumer agency in NYC. Costco should be required to list the contents including how many ounces of shrimp and how many of sauce on the label—and to provide at least as much as labeled. Too bad no one cares about enforcing the consumer protection laws in this country.
Flag this comment
Nick
Aug 12, 2009 3:46 PM CST
This is the exact kind of claim that makes me cringe. Our Founding Fathers would never have thought that judicial resources and money would go toward a lawsuit brought by some guy who was too lazy to (1) buy a bag of shrimp (2) buy some sauce (3) buy some lemon wedges, and (4) take them home and put on a plate.
We do need “consumer protection laws” but not in this context. Our resources need to be focused on preventing poisonous foods/products coming in from China and other low cost countries.
This Complaint is all the more laughable when one considers that 90% of the World would be quite happy with the somewhat less than 16 oz of shrimp he got.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.