• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Courts Must Streamline in ‘Buyer’s Market,’ Longtime Partner Says

Law Practice Management

Firms & Courts Must Streamline in ‘Buyer’s Market,’ Longtime Partner Says

Posted Aug 3, 2009 11:10 AM CST
By Martha Neil

A downturn in the corporate legal market that is unprecedented in the memory of those in practice today is going to force both major law firms and the courts to make significant changes in the way they do business, a longtime lawyer predicts.

Law firms will have to be more cost-efficient and, pressured by corporate clients to reduce hourly rates, will have a greater incentive to develop workable alternative billing arrangements, writes litigator David Marion in a Bulletin article. The 45-year practitioner is a former chairman of Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads in Philadelphia.

"The severity of the current recession and its effects on law firms are unprecedented in modern times, may not end soon, and may persist for the legal profession beyond the time of recovery for the economy in general," he writes. "It is now a buyers’ market for legal services, and corporate in-house counsel are realizing that they have the upper hand and they need no longer tolerate the way law firms handle and bill for legal engagements."

Likewise, the judicial system will have to change its procedure to handle litigation more swiftly, more efficiently and more predictably, or else watch an ever-increasing number of businesses turn to alternative dispute resolution, he writes.

Comments

1.

Esq.
Aug 3, 2009 12:29 PM CST

I think that Mr. Martin has overlooked the fact that Courts are not money-making institutions.  They are instead constitutionally-mandated, taxpayer-funded, bureaucratic branches of government. 

Further, if Mr. Martin has not noticed, the courts are already so overburdened with needless litigation (which sole purpose is to keep corporate lawyers employed) that if the Courts lost HALF of all cases to ADR, it would be a positive thing.

And I frankly have no comment for the suggestion that the courts handle litigation more “predictably” other than to ask if Mr. Martin has heard of politics.

Flag this comment

2.

B. McLeod
Aug 3, 2009 2:12 PM CST

Maybe Mr. Martin is thinking of the Pennsylvania courts, where it seems at least some of the (now former) judges actually have been money-making institutions.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.