Administrative Law
FTC Suspends ‘Red Flags Rule’ Requiring Law Firms to Create ID Theft Policies
Posted Jul 29, 2009 1:09 PM CST
By Martha Neil
Citing uncertainty among small businesses about their compliance obligations, the Federal Trade Commission has suspended until Nov. 1 implementation of its controversial "Red Flags Rule."
The new regulations, which require businesses, including law firms, to develop policies to combat identity theft, have drawn fire from the ABA, notes the Daily Record. They implement the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act and had been scheduled to take effect on Aug. 1.
Although the FTC contends that law firms fall within the definition of creditor covered by the FACT statute, the ABA says Congress did not intend law firms to be regulated in this manner.
In a written statement, ABA President H. Thomas Wells Jr. called the FTC move a "very vital step" and commended the agency for responding to concerns expressed by bar associations and others in this manner.
However, he also said that "the FTC’s continued assertion that it can, as it sees fit, regulate lawyers under the 'red flags' provisions is troubling, and unacceptable to the ABA," citing a long history of state regulation of the bar and clients' need for independent legal advice.
More details are provided in an FTC press release.
Additional coverage:
ABAJournal.com: "Is FTC Hedging on Plans to Apply ID Theft Rule to Law Firms?"
ABAJournal.com: "ABA to Sue if FTC Won’t Exempt Lawyers from ID Theft Rules"
Blog of Legal Times: "FTC Delays Enforcement That Would Affect Lawyers"
Business Insurance: "FTC's Red Flags may color some surprised"
Updated at 3:30 p.m. to include information from Wells statement and link to Blog of Legal Times coverage.

Comments
Jeff Greene
Jul 31, 2009 2:46 PM CST
In the name of all that is clear-headed and sane…
How on Earth could the FTC create a set of new and binding RULES OF OPERATIONS for businesses, that are about to become The Law Of The Land, and not intend for it to affect Lawyers?
Flag this comment
Caroline
Aug 2, 2009 12:32 PM CST
How is it unreasonable for law firms to be required to protect against identity theft??
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.