• Home
  • News
  • Ga. Supreme Court Overturns Judge’s Order Banning Kids’ Contact with Gays

Family Law

Ga. Supreme Court Overturns Judge’s Order Banning Kids’ Contact with Gays

Posted Jun 16, 2009 6:26 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

The Georgia Supreme Court has overturned a divorce court order barring a father’s three youngest children from having contact with his gay and lesbian friends.

Gay rights groups praised the decision, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports. The supreme court said there had been no showing in the 2007 divorce case of Eric Duane Mongerson and Sandy Kay Ehlers Mongerson that any gays or lesbians had behaved inappropriately in front of the children. The order by a Fayette County judge “assumes, without evidentiary support, that the children will suffer harm from any such contact,” the court said.

Beth Littrell, staff attorney for the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund in Atlanta, told the newspaper that the ruling ensures visitation decisions are “not based on the prejudices of individual judges.”

“The court has done the right thing today by focusing on the needs of the children instead of perpetuating stigma on the basis of sexual orientation,” she said.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
Jun 16, 2009 8:20 AM CST

The Lambdas on the green hills, they sport and they play,
And many strawberries grow ‘round the salt sea.

Flag this comment

2.

Anonymous
Jun 16, 2009 11:20 AM CST

Victory, eh?  Right up there with these from The Onion:

http://www.theonion.com/content/infograph/landmark_gay_rights_cases

Flag this comment

3.

CJT
Jun 16, 2009 1:39 PM CST

Comment removed by moderator.

Flag this comment

4.

JN
Jun 16, 2009 2:25 PM CST

Is the Westboro baptist church going to picket the Georgia Supreme Court now?

Flag this comment

5.

CJT
Jun 16, 2009 2:57 PM CST

To the moderator…

My #3 comment was meant as a sarcastic joke, I would think the phonetic spelling would be enough to distinguish it from a serious comment.  In the alternative, is the ABA attempting to censor speech that might offend redneck homophobes?  Now that would certain be a step away from the ABA’s devoted tradition of liberalism. 

Regardless, get a sense of humor.

Flag this comment

6.

B. McLeod
Jun 18, 2009 12:19 AM CST

The Mollerator is under constant pressure from some of the more mirth-challenged readers to maintain “respectable standards” on this site, and does not have time to debate every ruling.  Arguing with her is like arguing with the judges at a Judo tournament (one rung down from trying to give commands to a cat).  You can do it, of course, but it is not likely to change the result.  It is more productive to try to figure out what was over the line, and move on.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.