• Home
  • News
  • Gambler Hits Jackpot in IRS Case, Sets Tax Precedent

Tax Law

Gambler Hits Jackpot in IRS Case, Sets Tax Precedent

Posted Mar 17, 2008 5:21 PM CST
By Martha Neil

A rare precedent-setting win against the IRS earlier this year is making the lucky taxpayer something of a folk hero among those whom fortune hasn't favored to the same extent.

Scrutinized by the federal tax agency over the nearly $2.5 million in gambling losses he claimed during a three-year period, Frank Gagliardi, 46, clearly had an above-average ability to fight his case in court. For one thing, the $26.7 million the compulsive gambler won in the California lottery in 1991 brings in an annual income of more than $666,000 according to the San Diego Union-Tribune and the Online Casino Advisory blog.

That meant he not only had a lot of money to lose at the slot machines, but plenty to pay to fight his case. "Gagliardi brought in psychologists who testified to the nature of addictive gambling; a girlfriend who said he was so busy playing slots it took three days for him to realize she had left him; and witnesses who swore he played right through the 9/11 catastrophe," the blog recounts.

“He had to spend a lot of money to substantiate his losses,” his attorney, Eric Swenson, who tried the case with Allison Cato, tells the newspaper. But, in the end, Gagliardi persuaded a tax-court judge that he had, in fact, sustained seven-figure gambling losses.

Now the case is expected to make it easier for other taxpayers to claim their gambling losses, too.

Comments

1.

msg
Mar 18, 2008 1:46 PM CST

Glad to see someone beat the IRS!

Flag this comment

2.

Nancy
Mar 21, 2008 5:51 AM CST

So did he actually gain anything from this??
It looks like he spent more “defending” himself than he would have paid in taxes.

Flag this comment

3.

Dave
Mar 21, 2008 7:44 AM CST

The government is always quick to be the taxpayer’s silent partner when the taxpayer is a winner,insisting upon their cut of any gain.Yet the government is sometimes slow to except the losses incured in their partnership with the taxpayer.

Flag this comment

4.

john
Mar 21, 2008 10:21 AM CST

Typical gov’t b.s.  #3 is exactly right and highlights the many double standards in the gov’t.

Flag this comment

5.

bill
Mar 21, 2008 3:41 PM CST

#3 is correct BUT keep in mind the ease of proving wins and the difficulty of proving losses
and that is where the expense lies (no pun intended)

Flag this comment

6.

Christine
Mar 24, 2008 10:25 AM CST

This is great.  Someone who had the money to take on IRS did while set a great precedent for other gamblers.  Dont those casino cards keep track of wins and losses? Full time gamblers can now file schedule “C”?

Flag this comment

7.

Diego
Mar 24, 2008 3:22 PM CST

I’ve seen the IRS accept ATM withdrawals at casino ATMs as sufficient evidence of gambling losses, but not always.  #6 is correct that it is best to always use the ‘players club’ cards from the casinos.  I have seen clients get records going back several years from some casinos.  He is wrong about the Schedule C though.  You can only take gambling losses up to the amount of your gambling winnings, and good luck claiming your travel expenses or those ‘How to Win at Slots’ books.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.