U.S. Supreme Court

Gay-marriage opponents cite SCOTUS summary dismissal in 1972; is it still good law?

In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed an appeal seeking to overturn Minnesota’s gay-marriage law in Baker v. Nelson with a one-line summary dismissal. “The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question,” the court said.

A Tennessee judge cited the precedent in upholding Tennessee’s refusal to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere, the Washington Post reports. And the case was discussed during oral arguments on gay-marriage restrictions earlier this month before the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The U.S. Supreme Court did not cite Baker v. Nelson when it struck down a federal law that bans federal benefits to same-sex married couples, or when it left intact a decision allowing gay marriage in California.

“So does that mean the justices found Baker is a relic, or that it was simply unnecessary to its opinions in the two cases, and remains binding on lower courts?” asked the Post. Most judges who have considered gay-marriage laws have found the 1972 case is no longer good law. A contrary decision in the 6th Circuit could put the issue before the Supreme Court.

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy and the ABA Code of Conduct.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.