Bankruptcy Law
House OKs Mortgage ‘Cramdown’ Bill; Tougher Fight Expected in Senate
Posted Mar 5, 2009 8:02 PM CST
By Martha Neil
A controversial bill that would give bankruptcy judges the power to reduce the principal balance on a debtor's personal residence passed the U.S. House of Representatives tonight but is expected to face a tougher fight in the Senate.
Under the "cramdown" legislation, bankruptcy judges could also reduce the interest rate and lengthen the term of a struggling homeowner's mortgage, reports the Washington Post.
Opposed by Republicans and the mortgage industry, which say it will unfairly lead to higher costs for all mortgage borrowers, the bill is described by proponents as a necessary measure to encourage lenders to work with the struggling homeowners and create a solid footing for the plunging economy.
Often, it is not in a lender's interest to foreclose, because the litigation process is expensive, and the lender eventually may get only a small fraction of what a home used to be worth, as it sits vacant, inviting vandalism, in a horrendous housing market.
However, because of the manner in which mortgages have routinely been sold to third parties in recent years—as part of "securitized" bundles that are fractionally owned by large numbers of investors—it can be very difficult or impossible for a mortgage servicer to get permission from investors to modify a homeowner's loan. Hence, the cramdown legislation is proposed to end this borrower-investor impasse.
Related coverage:
ABAJournal.com: "Bankruptcy Filings Up 31% in 2008; Mortgage Foreclosures Hit New High"

Comments
Michael
Mar 6, 2009 10:56 AM CST
Obama should just do a takings: no help needed from obstructionist Republicans. Hold an auction where only entities that have taken no government money can bid and who agree to resell the note to the debtor at no more than a 5-percent gain or refinance it at no more than a 25% gain. After people bid—probably for a few cents on the dollar; maybe less—invoke the takings clause and Kelo (a case championed by the real-estate industry, after all) to take the notes and transfer them to the buyer. Fair market value is set by the auction value and the taking clears all claims. So that $500K mortgage becomes a very manageable $5-20K or so, all perfectly legal under Kelo. Banks, hedge funds, and sovereign wealth investors are wiped out but they signed up for the risk and resisted more reasonable workout attempts. Let the market set prices: that’s what why our founders added the nuclear option when the owner of a property was causing societal mayhem.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Mar 7, 2009 9:10 PM CST
I’ve heard the stories about “Cramdown Bill.” Word is that when he comes round on behalf of a debtor, the secureds just stand aside. And, Bill doesn’t even charge $1,100/hour like the bastards back east.
Flag this comment
phillip johnson
Mar 8, 2009 2:02 PM CST
The mortgage cramdown should be defeated
in the senate,it will only create higher interest
rate on mortgages with investor fear and dry
up availability of presents loans.
Flag this comment
JayJay
Mar 10, 2009 11:17 AM CST
Here in California we have a number of families being forced out of their homes with the probability they will never own again. Their foreclosed homes are sold to speculators and investors for about 50 percent of what the families purchased them for. Those same families end up renting from these investors paying their mortgage. The cramdown legislation will force the banks to deal with these families. This bill does not change the risk of default on any loan, that stays the same. It just halts the potential transfer of ownership in the event of a default. I would rather have families living in homes than speculators renting out homes in order to make a fast buck. After all, wasn’t it the fast buck mentality what got us here in the first place?
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.