Layoffs
Hunton & Williams Lays Off 23 Lawyers and 64 Staffers
Posted May 14, 2009 8:43 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
In its first round of job cuts, Hunton & Williams has laid off 23 associates and of counsel and 64 staff members.
The layoffs are spread among most practice areas and offices, according to a statement by managing partner Wally Martinez that was provided to the ABA Journal. “We did not come to this very difficult decision lightly,” Martinez said in the statement. “We have, over the past many months, taken aggressive steps to manage our expenses with a principal goal being to avoid across-the-board layoffs.”
The cuts amount to 2 percent of the firm's lawyers and 6 percent of its staff, the Am Law Daily reports.
"We're quite late getting to the layoff table, but the economic situation is a lot more prolonged and deeper than we had expected,” Martinez told the Am Law Daily. He said the layoffs were made after "we conducted our own internal stress test."
The firm has pursued an aggressive growth strategy in recent years, and Martinez said it’s not abandoning its plans. "We're still actively engaged in a couple of very important lateral discussions right now," he told the publication. "In a downturn, the margin for error is less, but you still bank on growth."

Comments
Chris Daniels
May 15, 2009 6:03 AM CST
B. McLeod?
Anyone seen B. McLeod?
What would it take to get that lady/gentleman a regular editorial on this thing?
I go through all the effort to scroll past the articles to read his posts and here I am posting first. Not cool, B. Not cool.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
May 15, 2009 7:09 AM CST
My bad. Obviously, the layoffs are back this week and month, but still considerably down from March. That probably does not mean things will be easy for castaways getting their walking papers now, but may be a sign we are moving toward some improvement.
Flag this comment
jh
May 15, 2009 9:59 AM CST
ABA Journal’s May 2009 issue reports in a page 31 article entitled “Hunton is Hiring (Really)” that, well, Hunton is hiring. I understand that deadlines in magazines have a long lead time, but it seems like if Hunton was conducting a “stress test,” the firm would have known about it when the article was reported. So, either the Journal dropped the ball or let Hunton pull the wool get pulled over its eyes. Or both. The article did read like a press release, after all.
Flag this comment
jh
May 15, 2009 10:00 AM CST
Sorry, I meant “or let Hunton pull the wool over its eyes.” Hard to edit in this little box.
Flag this comment
Charis P
May 15, 2009 12:55 PM CST
@jh That ABA Journal article is about lateral acquisitions and the managing partner in this article stated that the firm is still negotiating lateral acquisitions so there is no contradiction in the two articles.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
May 15, 2009 10:10 PM CST
Quite right, Charis P. It is supremely cold for the departing “associates” to have to see their former offices and parking spaces being reassigned to incoming laterals who have, as yet, never done anything for the firm. But, business is business. Part of large firm culture lies in “associates” being mere, fungible toys, for disposition at the whim of partners. (Presumably, they knew the job was dangerous when they took it).
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.