Law Firms

Imprecise Contract Costs Thelen Reid $450K

A law firm’s failure to specify a requirement for minimum billings in an employment contract has cost it a $450,000 arbitration award.

A New York judge has upheld the award to a former partner of Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner who was fired in violation of his employment contract, the New York Law Journal reports. The law firm merged with Thelen Reid & Priest in 2006 and is now known as Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner.

Brown Raysman contended it fired Lee Goldberg because he wasn’t billing sufficient hours. But Judge Bernard Fried said the contract to pay Goldberg $400,000 the first year and $425,000 the second did not contain any billing requirements, the legal newspaper reports.

The law firm had argued it had a reasonable expectation that Goldberg would bill a reasonable amount of hours, and the $260,000 he generated in client business the first year at the firm failed to meet that expectation.

“To suggest that Brown Raysman bargained for a million-dollar space warmer is irrational on its face,” the firm argued. “This is not an agreement to pay an hourly wage to a store clerk who may be required to stand idle when business is slow. [Goldberg] was purportedly a multimillion-dollar originator with a duty to develop a practice. He was expected to bill more than a day a week. [The firm] did not agree, as he testified, to pay him $400,000 simply on the (albeit unstated) commitment that he would not ‘goof off.’ “

Beveridge & Diamond Partner in Messy Divorce

Sanctions Will Deter Discovery Abuse, Qualcomm Magistrate Says

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.