• Home
  • News
  • John Yoo Doesn’t Take Criticism Quietly

Law Professors

John Yoo Doesn’t Take Criticism Quietly

Posted Jul 27, 2009 9:17 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Former Justice Department official John Yoo is facing criticism and a lawsuit over legal memos approving harsh interrogation techniques of terrorism suspects, but that hasn’t caused him to retreat from the public eye.

Yoo, a tenured law professor at the University of California at Berkeley, is teaching courses as a visiting professor at Chapman University law school, the Washington Post reports. He is traveling across the country to refute his critics and writing opinion pieces, including one in the Wall Street Journal that called his critics’ arguments “foolhardy.” “The blaze of criticism that ignited late in the Bush administration appears to have pushed Yoo, 42, onto a far more assertive path, according to friends and lawyers who have followed his career,” the Post story says.

A Justice Department ethics report expected to be release in coming weeks could renounce Yoo’s earlier views and recommend that he be referred to his state bar for discipline, sources told the Post. Another colleague, Jay Bybee, now a federal appeals judge, could be recommended for discipline as well, the source said. Ethics experts, however, have expressed doubts about whether the lawyers could be disciplined for their legal advice. In Pennsylvania, where Yoo is licensed, there is a five-year statute of limitations for lawyer misconduct that would make an ethics inquiry unlikely, the Post says.

“Yoo is a man with little to lose,” the story says.

Comments

1.

J.D.
Jul 27, 2009 10:24 AM CST

When a cabal of leftists join forces to throw you in jail for your opinion and analysis, of course you’re going to respond and not take it “quietly.”

Criticism is one thing. What’s been thrown at him by the Obama Admin the the media is entirely something else.

Flag this comment

2.

MacTheKnife
Jul 27, 2009 4:05 PM CST

On December 1, 2005, Yoo appeared in a debate in Chicago with University of Notre Dame law professor Doug Cassel. During the debate Cassel asked Yoo, “If the president deems that he’s got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person’s child, there is no law that can stop him?”, to which Yoo replied “No treaty.” Cassel followed up with “Also no law by Congress — that is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo…”, to which Yoo replied “I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that.”

Flag this comment

3.

B. McLeod
Jul 29, 2009 10:55 AM CST

Yes, he’s finally figured out that even infamy can be milked.  Maybe he’ll do a 12-round, televised bare-knuckle match with Tonya Harding.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.