• Home
  • News
  • Judge Fines PD: 1 Day OK for Trial Prep

Legal Ethics

Judge Fines PD: 1 Day OK for Trial Prep

Posted Aug 27, 2007 9:37 AM CST
By Martha Neil

Saying that a 20-minute talk with one's client and interviewing witnesses during one's lunch hour is sufficient preparation to allow a lawyer to try a case, an Ohio judge reportedly upheld his own earlier contempt-of-court citation and fined an assistant public defender Friday.

Brian Jones refused to try a misdemeanor trial before Portage County Municipal Court Judge John Plough on Aug. 16 because he'd just been assigned the case. But Plough disagreed—and, as discussed in an earlier ABAJournal.com post, had the young assistant Portage County public defender arrested for contempt of court. At a hearing for Jones on Friday, Plough upheld the contempt finding and fined him $100 but stayed the fine because Jones plans to appeal, reports the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

Jones didn't testify, but a witness, Arkansas lawyer John Wesley Hall Jr., said it would be impossible for a lawyer to prepare adequately in the two and one-half hours that Jones had to do so, the Post reports. "Nobody could. I couldn't," said Hall, who is president-elect of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. There were five witnesses in the client's case, and a good lawyer would talk to all of them, Hall said.

Plough said Jones should have tried the case as ordered. Had his client been convicted, the judge said, an appeal could have been filed claiming Jones was ineffective counsel due to a judicial order, according to the newspaper.

News reports conflict slightly: Plough appointed Jones to represent the defendant on Aug. 15, but Jones first learned of the Aug. 16 trial the same day, according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer. The Post-Gazette says Jones was fined $100; the Plain Dealer says $150 (and also indicates the judge gave Jones a suspended three-day jail sentence).

Comments

1.

Rolf Asphaug
Aug 31, 2007 10:53 AM CST

Oh, that’s rich: “I, the judge, order you to go ahead and try this case with inadequate preparation, and if your client gets sent up the river he can appeal claiming ‘ineffective asssitance of counsel.’”

Assuming the facts as reported are correct and complete, that seems like some sort of sick joke - not “justice for all.”

Um, maybe giving the poor lawyer at least a few more days to prepare - enough time to interview the witnesses, at least - might be a somewhat better strategy to conserve judicial resources?

Not to mention the huge waste of resources with all the appeals, court appearances, etc. that this farce has already engendered.

2.

Charles H Nadler
Aug 31, 2007 11:44 PM CST

The Judge also brought the system of justice into ridicule, which is an ethical violation on the part of the Judge.  This surely is contemptible, and so it is probably true that Mr. Jones held the Court in contempt, as well he should!  I don’t know any criminal defense lawyer who wouldn’t hold the Judge in contempt!

3.

Kathleen Kauffmann
Sep 2, 2007 10:37 AM CST

Judge Plough’s actions, both in ordering the public defender to go to trial without sufficient time to prepare, as well as finding him in contempt and fining him, highlights the most serious issue facing the judiciary today - judicial arrogance.  As a fellow public servant on the bench, I would urge Judge Plough to reflect upon his responsibilities and set aside his ego.

4.

AutPrice
Sep 4, 2007 7:24 AM CST

Why are judges not held to the high standard that the rules of ethics claim they are?  Most judges are paid handsomely for their service and are accorded much free time.  Most public defenders are overworked and underpaid.  Put an end to judicial arrogance!

5.

Marian
Sep 8, 2007 12:13 AM CST

This one judge will do more to move forward on removing absolute judicial imunity in one case than most judges will do in a life time.  Both the attorney and his client should have the right to sue this jurist.  Unfortunately, because judges are next to God in this country that won’t happen.  And people complain about lawyers…sheesh!

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.