Legal Ethics
Judge Sanctions Plaintiffs Lawyer $25K for Unsupported Fee Applications
Posted Mar 24, 2009 12:24 PM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
A federal judge has sanctioned a San Francisco plaintiffs lawyer $25,000 for filing fee requests that weren’t supported by time records.
Judge Susan Illston imposed the sanction against lawyer Waukeen McCoy and refused his request for more than $2 million in fees in discrimination litigation against FedEx, the Recorder reports. Ilston said most of McCoy’s fee petitions weren’t based on contemporaneous billing records, despite his assertions to the contrary.
A special master had recommended the sanction, saying McCoy created billing records after the fact and misrepresented the nature of documents.
McCoy called the ruling “arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law.”
“As a civil rights attorney fighting many billion-dollar corporations and powerful conglomerates, attacks on my character are to be expected," he told the Recorder.

Comments
B. McLeod
Mar 24, 2009 2:03 PM CST
Looks like he’s Waukeen a fine line.
Aaron Morris
Mar 24, 2009 2:38 PM CST
Following the links from the Recorder article offers the whole tortured tale. McCoy allegedly billed 129.5 hours opposing a summary judgment motion. Only problem was he billed it five months before the motion was filed, according to the Recorder article. Ironically, McCoy fought the fee bill submitted by his co-counsel, because he felt it might reduce his own fees. A strong candidate for the rogues gallery. http://www.toplawfirm.com/bigfirms.html
Love the “Waukeen a fine line” comment.
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.