• Home
  • News
  • Judge Sued for Allegedly Requiring Muslim Woman to Remove Hijab

Constitutional Law

Judge Sued for Allegedly Requiring Muslim Woman to Remove Hijab

Posted Aug 26, 2009 3:54 PM CST
By Martha Neil

A Michigan woman and an Islamic civil rights group filed a federal lawsuit against a Detroit judge today, contending that he insisted she remove her hijab, a religious head covering, during a June 16 court hearing about her petition for a name change.

The suit, which names both Judge William Callahan and Wayne County as defendants, seeks a court order prohibiting Callahan and other judges from requiring women in their courtrooms to remove religious headwear. It describes the alleged practice as unconstitutional infringement of their right to practice their religion and to access the courts, according to CNN and the Detroit News.

It appears that Callahan may not have realized that the Raneen Albaghdady's hijab—which he refers to as a "hat" in a court transcript—had religious significance: He says she didn't explain that it did during the hearing; she indicates that she stopped protesting and agreed to uncover her head during the hearing because she was intimidated by the judge, according to news reports.

"Judge Callahan and the court have the greatest respect for spiritual practices and all religious preferences. Had he been informed that the head covering had some religious significance, the judge would have permitted Ms. Albaghdady to continue wearing it in court," says a written statement issued jointly by the judge and the 3rd Circuit Court of Michigan in response to the suit.

A partial video of the incident was posted today on YouTube by the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which is a co-plaintiff in the suit. The group says that Callahan should have known, after 12 years on the bench in an area with a substantial number of Islamic residents, that a woman's head covering could have religious significance.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
Aug 26, 2009 10:09 PM CST

In the words of Fred Ali Bin Flintstone, “Hijabba dabba doo!”

Flag this comment

2.

Tory
Aug 27, 2009 7:13 AM CST

Not funny to ridicule someone’s religious customs.

Flag this comment

3.

sam
Aug 27, 2009 7:15 AM CST

Does this mean I can wear a hat in court.  I don’t want to take the time to do my hair some days.  There is no difference between a hat an a hijab.

Flag this comment

4.

Anon
Aug 27, 2009 7:42 AM CST

Religious attire should be entirely banned in courtrooms, as should uniforms, unless the wearer is testifying in an official capacity.

It’s just as wrong for this lady to wear a religious headscarf as it is for a nun or military service member to show up for her vehicular manslaughter trial in full habit or dripping with medals.  You can’t really ban it in select circumstances; it needs to be across the board.

Flag this comment

5.

AndytheLawyer
Aug 27, 2009 2:54 PM CST

Responding to #2—It actually IS funny to mock others’ religious customs.  “One man’s religion is another man’s belly laugh.”—Robert A. Heinlein.

Of course, a lot of the mockery is a product of ignorance—sometimes as stunning as this judge’s.  Before I became a lawyer I spent a couple of years in Afghanistan, where my neighbors included two nuns who kept a portable folding altar in a box for use if a priest happened to pass through town.  One day, one of their servants asked me if those women were crazy—because, as far as he could deduce from his bad English and their worse Dari, they seriously thought they had God locked up in that box.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.