Constitutional Law

Judge's Sanction Banning Website Mention of Law Firm and Members Violated 1st Amendment


A California judge had the power to ban a San Diego woman from continuing to make statements online that had been found to be false and defamatory.

But the trial court went too far, an appellate panel found, when it banned Maura Larkins, as a sanction for continued violation of the rules, from making any mention whatsoever of Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz, or the firm’s members, reports the Metropolitan News-Enterprise.

In addition to being an unconstitutional prior restraint in violation of the first amendment, the Internet speech ban was not the least restrictive means of achieving compliance with the trial court’s ruling, held the 4th District Court of Appeal in its Friday ruling.

Previous:
President Zack Lauds ABA for Willingness to 'Get in the Way' on Issues

Next:
ABA Votes to Expand Voting Body to Include US Territories


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.