• Home
  • News
  • Judges Appear Surprised as US Presses State Secrets Privilege

Attorney General

Judges Appear Surprised as US Presses State Secrets Privilege

Posted Feb 10, 2009 6:04 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

In a case closely watched for a preview of the Obama’s administration’s terrorism policies, a Justice Department lawyer invoked the state secrets privilege before a federal appeals court yesterday.

Bush administration lawyers had advanced the same argument to win dismissal of the case against Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen Dataplan, accused of flying terrorism suspects to overseas prisons for torture under an extraordinary rendition program by the CIA.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Douglas Letter had argued the case for the Bush administration, and he was back yesterday before a panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the Daily Journal reports (sub. req.). Letter said the Justice Department under Attorney General Eric Holder had fully vetted and approved the state secrets claim, the story says.

"Judges shouldn't play with fire," Letter told the judges, according to an account in the San Francisco Chronicle. He said the core allegations in the case could not be examined without endangering national security.

The argument seemed to surprise the appeals panel, the New York Times reports. “The change in administration has no bearing?” Judge Mary Schroeder asked. Letter replied it did not.

The American Civil Liberties Union represented the plaintiffs, five men who claim they were flown to overseas prisons by Jeppesen. ACLU director Anthony Romero released a statement chastising the new administration for its position.

“This is not change,” he said. “This is definitely more of the same. Candidate Obama ran on a platform that would reform the abuse of state secrets, but President Obama’s Justice Department has disappointingly reneged on that important civil liberties issue.”

Justice Department spokesman Matt Miller said the Obama administration would invoke the state secrets privilege “only when necessary and in the most appropriate cases.” He said Attorney General Eric Holder has ordered a review of all state secrets claims, according to the Associated Press and Reuters.

Comments

1.

mako
Feb 10, 2009 8:11 AM CST

Within 10 years you will see states looking to suceed from the union.  The federal government is just screwing the states and the people.

Flag this comment

2.

J.D.
Feb 10, 2009 8:59 AM CST

This is just idealism taking a backseat to reality, a move entirely anticipated by anyone with a brain. Carter-appointee Judge Mary Schroeder still lives outside reality and therefore cannot comprehend why it might be a good thing to not give individuals who would slit her throat in a heartbeat an advantage.

This must be so difficult for Obama. All the decades of liberal indoctrination Obama experienced in that echo chamber known as academia are suddenly going to be confronted with reality. He has so much to learn and analyze in such a short period of time.

But instead of producing a thesis—where he’s free to take illogical, and potentially-dangerous positions—he’s now required to actually act, with the repercussions falling squarely on his shoulders.

If he doesn’t take a rational position, and terrorism results, he risks damaging the Democrat party for decades to come. If he does take the rational route, he’ll alienate the radical base that elected him.

This is exactly the problem John Kerry ran into; by trying to appease both the rational and the irrational Dems, he had to be both “for the war and against it.” But that happened during the campaign. Because the media gave Obama a pass and asked no hard questions during his campaign, this vacillation is only now coming to light and will end up defining his presidency.

Flag this comment

3.

Michael
Feb 10, 2009 11:22 AM CST

How weird for an appellate court judge to say “this is not change…”  I disagree with the underlying argument but if the judges think it’s nonsense they should just rule that way based on existing laws, not argue the political process should have changed the government’s position.

Flag this comment

4.

Peter
Feb 10, 2009 11:55 AM CST

Obama won the election.  He gets to appoint judges who will write the law and make decisions based on Obama’s agenda.  Stop crying.

Flag this comment

5.

Paul the Magyar
Feb 10, 2009 1:07 PM CST

“How weird for an appellate court judge to say ‘this is not change…’”

The ACLU director Anthony Romero made that statement, not an appellate court judge.

Flag this comment

6.

John Tieso
Feb 10, 2009 5:14 PM CST

Lawyers live in their own world, and political administrations—even though they set policy—do not apparently set conduct.  The US Assistant US Attorney should be fired.  Conversely, we may have a situation where Obama has no control over his Justice Department.  In charge is Eric Holder—the torture king who may not feel he has to respond to a simple ‘politican’.

Flag this comment

7.

B. McLeod
Feb 10, 2009 6:28 PM CST

Yeah, Romero took my line.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.